prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Poetry in Classical Nahuatl, the language of the Aztec Empire, relies on difrasismo, or a parallel noun construction that conventionally...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Practice Test
Information and Ideas
Central Ideas and Details
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Poetry in Classical Nahuatl, the language of the Aztec Empire, relies on difrasismo, or a parallel noun construction that conventionally operates as a single metaphor. For example, the common difrasismo in cuauhtli in ocelotl (literally, 'the eagle, the jaguar') signifies 'warrior.' The device's function is both formal—providing structure to lines of verse—and ritual: semantic relations among the two nouns and the concept they signify can be tenuous, as in the previous example, such that difrasismos are often only intelligible according to the conceptual associations observed in Aztec ceremonial culture.

Which statement about the difrasismo in cuauhtli in ocelotl is most strongly supported by the text?

A

Its metaphorical significance derives from the semantic equivalence of the two nouns constituting the difrasismo.

B

Its unintelligibility may cause its formal function within a line of verse to go unnoticed by present-day readers.

C

Its apparent obscurity can be resolved when considered in the proper cultural context.

D

Its frequency in Classical Nahuatl poetry confirms its intelligibility to the Aztec audience.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Part A: Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Poetry in Classical Nahuatl, the language of the Aztec Empire, relies on difrasismo, or a parallel noun construction that conventionally operates as a single metaphor."
  • What it says: Nahuatl poetry uses difrasismo = 2 nouns → 1 metaphor
  • What it does: Introduces the main concept and defines what difrasismo is
  • What it is: Definition/context
"For example, the common difrasismo in cuauhtli in ocelotl (literally, 'the eagle, the jaguar') signifies 'warrior.'"
  • What it says: "eagle, jaguar" = "warrior"
  • What it does: Provides concrete example of the concept just defined
  • What it is: Example
"The device's function is both formal—providing structure to lines of verse—and ritual:"
  • What it says: Difrasismo has 2 jobs: structure + ritual
  • What it does: Explains the purposes this literary device serves
  • What it is: Function explanation
"semantic relations among the two nouns and the concept they signify can be tenuous, as in the previous example,"
  • What it says: Connection between nouns + meaning = weak/unclear
  • What it does: Describes a key characteristic using the eagle/jaguar example
  • What it is: Clarifying detail
"such that difrasismos are often only intelligible according to the conceptual associations observed in Aztec ceremonial culture."
  • What it says: Only make sense through Aztec ceremonial culture knowledge
  • What it does: Explains why these weak connections still work as metaphors
  • What it is: Explanation/conclusion

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

What's being asked? Which statement about the specific difrasismo example ("in cuauhtli in ocelotl") is most strongly supported by the text

What type of answer do we need? A claim that can be directly backed up by information in the passage about this particular example

Any limiting keywords? "most strongly supported by the text" - we need direct textual evidence, not inference

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The passage gives us several key pieces of information about the "eagle, jaguar" = "warrior" example
  • First, it shows that the connection between the two nouns and their meaning can be "tenuous" - meaning weak or unclear
  • Second, it tells us that such difrasismos are "often only intelligible according to the conceptual associations observed in Aztec ceremonial culture"
  • This means what might seem confusing or obscure to us becomes clear when we understand the cultural context
Answer Choices Explained
A

Its metaphorical significance derives from the semantic equivalence of the two nouns constituting the difrasismo.

✗ Incorrect

  • Claims metaphorical significance comes from "semantic equivalence" of the two nouns
  • This directly contradicts the passage, which states semantic relations can be "tenuous"
B

Its unintelligibility may cause its formal function within a line of verse to go unnoticed by present-day readers.

✗ Incorrect

  • Suggests unintelligibility causes formal function to be unnoticed by modern readers
  • Passage doesn't discuss modern readers' perception of formal function
C

Its apparent obscurity can be resolved when considered in the proper cultural context.

✓ Correct

  • States the apparent obscurity is resolved when considered in proper cultural context
  • This matches exactly what the passage tells us about the example
D

Its frequency in Classical Nahuatl poetry confirms its intelligibility to the Aztec audience.

✗ Incorrect

  • Claims frequency confirms intelligibility to Aztec audience
  • Passage never mentions frequency or provides evidence about historical audience understanding
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.