prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Psychologists wanted to test how young children think about rewards and fairness. In an experiment, two teachers handed out rewards...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Official
Information and Ideas
Central Ideas and Details
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Psychologists wanted to test how young children think about rewards and fairness. In an experiment, two teachers handed out rewards while children (ages four to six) watched. The teachers gave out the same number of rewards, but one of them counted the rewards out loud. The children were then asked who was fairer. 73% chose the teacher who counted. The psychologists think that counting showed the children that the teacher wanted to be fair. The children may have believed that the teacher who did not count did not care about fairness.

Which choice best states the main idea of the text?

A

Psychologists think children cannot understand the concept of fairness until they are six years old.

B

An experiment found that counting out loud is the best way to teach mathematical concepts to children.

C

Psychologists think young children expect to be rewarded when the children show that they care about fairness.

D

An experiment showed that the way rewards are given out may affect whether young children think the situation is fair.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Part A: Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
'Psychologists wanted to test how young children think about rewards and fairness.'
  • What it says: Psych study about kids' ideas about rewards + fairness
  • What it does: Introduces the research purpose
  • What it is: Research context
'In an experiment, two teachers handed out rewards while children (ages four to six) watched.'
  • What it says: Experiment: 2 teachers give rewards, kids (4-6) watch
  • What it does: Explains the experimental setup
  • What it is: Method description
'The teachers gave out the same number of rewards, but one of them counted the rewards out loud.'
  • What it says: Both teachers = same # rewards, but 1 counted aloud
  • What it does: Describes the key difference between conditions
  • What it is: Experimental variable
'The children were then asked who was fairer.'
  • What it says: Kids asked: which teacher fairer?
  • What it does: Presents the question posed to children
  • What it is: Dependent measure
'73% chose the teacher who counted.'
  • What it says: 73% picked counting teacher
  • What it does: Provides the main experimental result
  • What it is: Key finding
'The psychologists think that counting showed the children that the teacher wanted to be fair.'
  • What it says: Psych theory: counting = signal of caring about fairness
  • What it does: Explains the researchers' interpretation of results
  • What it is: Interpretation/theory
'The children may have believed that the teacher who did not count did not care about fairness.'
  • What it says: Kids maybe thought: no counting = no caring about fairness
  • What it does: Provides additional explanation for the pattern
  • What it is: Supporting interpretation

Part B: Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: An experiment showed that when children watch teachers distribute rewards, they are more likely to view the teacher who counts the rewards aloud as fairer, possibly because counting signals intentional attention to fairness.

Argument Flow: The passage begins by establishing the research goal of understanding children's fairness perceptions, then describes a simple experiment where the only difference between two reward-giving teachers was that one counted aloud. The strong preference for the counting teacher (73%) leads to the researchers' interpretation that counting serves as a fairness signal to young children.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

What's being asked? The main idea of the entire text

What type of answer do we need? A statement that captures the central message/finding of the passage

Any limiting keywords? 'Main idea' - we need the overarching point, not just a detail

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The right answer should capture that this was an experiment about children's perceptions of fairness
  • That involved different ways of giving out rewards (counting vs. not counting)
  • And showed that the method of distribution affected how fair children thought the situation was
  • It should reflect that this is about perception/judgment of fairness rather than about actual fairness or math skills
Answer Choices Explained
A

Psychologists think children cannot understand the concept of fairness until they are six years old.

✗ Incorrect

  • Claims psychologists think children cannot understand fairness until age 6
  • Passage actually shows 4-6 year olds making fairness judgments successfully
B

An experiment found that counting out loud is the best way to teach mathematical concepts to children.

✗ Incorrect

  • Focuses on teaching mathematical concepts through counting
  • Passage is not about math education - it is about fairness perceptions
C

Psychologists think young children expect to be rewarded when the children show that they care about fairness.

✗ Incorrect

  • Suggests children expect rewards when they show they care about fairness
  • Reverses the actual relationship - children judged teachers based on perceived fairness, not the other way around
D

An experiment showed that the way rewards are given out may affect whether young children think the situation is fair.

✓ Correct

  • States that how rewards are distributed affects children's fairness perceptions
  • Captures both the experimental nature and the main finding about fairness judgments
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.