Quantum particles of light—photons—provide an unhackable means of transmitting encryption keys over networks, as attempts to observe particles in quan...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Quantum particles of light—photons—provide an unhackable means of transmitting encryption keys over networks, as attempts to observe particles in quantum states will invariably alter the particles _______ dismantle any information they transmit.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Quantum particles of light—photons—
- provide an unhackable means of transmitting encryption keys over networks,
- as attempts to observe particles in quantum states
- will invariably alter the particles
- and [?] in the process [?] dismantle any information they transmit.
- will invariably alter the particles
- as attempts to observe particles in quantum states
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
The sentence starts with:
- 'Quantum particles of light—photons—'
- This identifies what we're talking about: photons are the quantum particles of light
- 'provide an unhackable means of transmitting encryption keys over networks'
- This tells us what makes photons special - they offer a secure way to send encryption keys
Now we get the explanation of WHY this is unhackable:
- 'as attempts to observe particles in quantum states will invariably alter the particles'
- If someone tries to observe/spy on these quantum particles, the act of observing will change them
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- They all have "and in the process"
- What varies is the comma placement: before "in the process," after it, both, or a dash
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues:
- 'dismantle any information they transmit'
So the complete action is:
- Attempting to observe these particles will:
- alter the particles AND
- dismantle any information they transmit
The phrase "in the process" is being inserted to clarify the relationship - the dismantling happens as part of/during the altering.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- "In the process" is an extra phrase that's interrupting the flow between "and" and "dismantle"
- If we remove it, the sentence still works: "alter the particles and dismantle any information"
- It's adding commentary about HOW these two actions relate, but it's not essential to the basic structure
- When you insert a phrase that interrupts the sentence flow like this, you need to mark BOTH where the interruption begins AND where it ends
- Think of it like opening and closing a parenthetical comment
- Since "in the process" comes after "and," we need punctuation before it and after it
So we need: and, in the process, dismantle
The correct answer is Choice B - it properly sets off the interruptive phrase "in the process" with commas on both sides.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Setting Off Interruptive Phrases with Paired Commas
When you insert a phrase into a sentence that adds extra information but interrupts the main flow, you need to set it off with matching punctuation on both sides (called a parenthetical element in grammar terms). The most common way to do this is with commas.
The Pattern:
- Main sentence flow: The company grew rapidly and expanded into new markets
- With interruptive phrase added: The company grew rapidly and, in just five years, expanded into new markets
- "in just five years" interrupts between "and" and "expanded"
- Comma before the phrase: and,
- Comma after the phrase: years,
- The phrase is now properly enclosed
Another Example:
- Main flow: She studied hard and passed the exam
- With interruption: She studied hard and, despite her initial doubts, passed the exam
- The phrase "despite her initial doubts" is set off with commas on both sides
In our question:
- Main flow: alter the particles and dismantle any information
- With interruption: alter the particles and, in the process, dismantle any information
- "in the process" needs commas on both sides to mark it as an interruptive comment
Key principle: Think of interruptive phrases like a parenthetical aside - you need to mark both where you're stepping aside from the main flow AND where you're returning to it.
- This only puts a comma AFTER "in the process" but not before it
- The interruptive phrase needs to be bracketed on both sides - you can't just mark the end without marking the beginning
- This leaves the interruption improperly punctuated
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
- This uses a dash after "in the process" but has no punctuation before it
- You can't use punctuation on only one side of an interruptive phrase
- If you were using dashes, you'd need them on both sides (and, in the process—), but mixing no punctuation with a dash is inconsistent and incorrect
- This only puts a comma BEFORE "in the process" but not after it
- This makes "in the process dismantle" run together incorrectly
- The phrase needs to be closed off with punctuation after it to show where the interruption ends and the main sentence flow resumes