Recent archaeological surveys in Peru have uncovered remarkable evidence of the Inca Empire's _____ achievements called qollqa, massive storage comple...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Recent archaeological surveys in Peru have uncovered remarkable evidence of the Inca Empire's _____ achievements called qollqa, massive storage complexes that preserved agricultural products through sophisticated ventilation systems built into strategic mountainside locations.
Which choice completes the text with the most logical and precise word or phrase?
infrastructure architectural
infrastructure. Architectural
infrastructure: architectural
infrastructure; architectural
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
• Recent archaeological surveys in Peru
• have uncovered remarkable evidence
• of the Inca Empire's infrastructure[?] architectural achievements
• called qollqa,
• massive storage complexes
• that preserved agricultural products
• through sophisticated ventilation systems
• built into strategic mountainside locations.
•
• Where [?] = no punctuation / period / colon / semicolon before "architectural"
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
"Recent archaeological surveys in Peru have uncovered remarkable evidence of the Inca Empire's infrastructure..."
Here we reach the blank. This is where we need to decide on the punctuation.
Let's look at the choices:
- We're deciding between: no punctuation, a period, a colon, or a semicolon
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The complete phrase is:
- "infrastructure [?] architectural achievements called qollqa, massive storage complexes that preserved agricultural products through sophisticated ventilation systems built into strategic mountainside locations."
Now let's really understand what this is telling us:
- "infrastructure"
- This is the general category - the broad type of achievement the surveys found evidence of
- "architectural achievements called qollqa"
- This is giving us the SPECIFIC type of infrastructure
- It's telling us: the infrastructure = architectural achievements
- And these are specifically called "qollqa"
- "massive storage complexes that preserved agricultural products..."
- This describes even more specifically what qollqa were
- They were sophisticated storage buildings on mountainsides
So the complete picture is:
- The sentence moves from general to specific
- General category: infrastructure
- Specific explanation: architectural achievements (specifically qollqa, which were massive storage complexes...)
What do we notice about the structure here?
- "Infrastructure" stands as a general term
- What comes after provides the specific details - exactly what KIND of infrastructure
- We need punctuation that shows this general-to-specific relationship
- We need punctuation that says "here's specifically what I mean by infrastructure"
A colon does exactly this job - it introduces a specification or explanation of what was just mentioned.
So we need a colon: infrastructure: architectural achievements
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Colons to Introduce Specifications and Explanations
A colon is used to introduce information that explains, specifies, or elaborates on what came right before it. The colon signals a general-to-specific relationship - you present a concept, then the colon says "here's what I specifically mean" or "let me explain that."
The pattern: [General term or statement] : [Specific explanation, details, or examples]
Example 1:
- The researchers found evidence of ancient technology: sophisticated irrigation systems that channeled water across miles of terrain.
- "ancient technology" = general term
- After the colon = specific example of what that technology was
Example 2:
- The museum acquired a rare artifact: a ceremonial mask from the Ming Dynasty.
- "a rare artifact" = general term
- After the colon = specific details about what artifact
In our question:
- "infrastructure" = general category
- Colon signals: "specifically, here's what kind"
- "architectural achievements called qollqa, massive storage complexes..." = the specific explanation
The colon creates a smooth flow from general concept to specific details, making the relationship between ideas crystal clear.
infrastructure architectural
✗ Incorrect
- Makes "infrastructure" and "architectural" both function as adjectives before "achievements"
- Creates awkward phrasing: "infrastructure architectural achievements"
- Doesn't show the general-to-specific relationship between the terms
- These aren't two coordinate adjectives; one is explaining the other
infrastructure. Architectural
✗ Incorrect
- Creates two separate sentences
- While grammatically possible, it breaks the logical connection
- The relationship between "infrastructure" and "architectural achievements" becomes unclear
- Makes the writing choppy and loses the flow of the explanation
- Doesn't show that "architectural achievements" is specifying what type of infrastructure
infrastructure: architectural
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
infrastructure; architectural
✗ Incorrect
- Semicolons connect two complete thoughts that could stand as independent sentences
- "of the Inca Empire's infrastructure" is not a complete thought - it's just a phrase fragment
- "architectural achievements called qollqa..." is also not a complete thought on its own here
- This is a grammatically incorrect use of a semicolon