prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Recent research into chronic fatigue syndrome produced noteworthy results. A novel drug therapy showed effectiveness across participants, though respo...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Prism
Information and Ideas
Inferences
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Recent research into chronic fatigue syndrome produced noteworthy results. A novel drug therapy showed effectiveness across participants, though responses varied by gender. Female participants experienced dramatic symptom improvements. Male participants also benefited significantly, albeit more modestly. Researchers have highlighted the treatment's potential for women specifically. However, this focus may reflect broader trends in research funding rather than the therapy's true scope. In 2023, funding agencies have prioritized women's health studies, making support harder to obtain for general chronic illness research.

This context suggests that ______

A

the study's findings reflect the broader challenges facing chronic illness research rather than a gender-specific breakthrough in women's health treatment.

B

the drug's effectiveness in female participants demonstrates the success of prioritizing women's health research over general chronic illness studies.

C

while the therapy shows promise for women with chronic fatigue syndrome, male participants' responses indicate the need for gender-specific treatment protocols.

D

the research is best understood as validating the funding agencies' focus on women's health rather than as evidence for broader therapeutic applications.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
"Recent research into chronic fatigue syndrome produced noteworthy results."
  • What it says: CFS research led to notable findings
  • What it does: Introduces the research topic and signals important outcomes
  • What it is: Opening context
"A novel drug therapy showed effectiveness across participants, though responses varied by gender."
  • What it says: New drug worked for all, but gender differences existed
  • What it does: Presents the main finding while noting variation
  • What it is: Primary claim
"Female participants experienced dramatic symptom improvements."
  • What it says: Women had major improvement
  • What it does: Provides specific evidence for the gender variation
  • What it is: Supporting evidence
"Male participants also benefited significantly, albeit more modestly."
  • What it says: Men had good improvement but less than women
  • What it does: Contrasts with the female results while showing both genders benefited
  • What it is: Contrasting evidence
"Researchers have highlighted the treatment's potential for women specifically."
  • What it says: Researchers emphasize women's potential
  • What it does: Explains how researchers are framing their findings
  • What it is: Researchers' interpretation
"However, this focus may reflect broader trends in research funding rather than the therapy's true scope."
  • What it says: Focus on women may reflect funding trends not actual drug scope
  • What it does: Introduces an alternative explanation for the researchers' emphasis
  • What it is: Counterpoint
"In 2023, funding agencies have prioritized women's health studies, making support harder to obtain for general chronic illness research."
  • What it says: 2023 funding agencies prioritize women's health, general illness research gets less funding
  • What it does: Provides concrete context for the alternative explanation
  • What it is: Supporting context

Provide Passage Architecture & Core Elements

Main Point: While a new chronic fatigue syndrome therapy shows effectiveness for both genders, researchers' emphasis on women's health benefits may be influenced by current funding priorities rather than the drug's actual therapeutic scope.

Argument Flow: The passage presents research findings showing a drug's effectiveness across genders, then introduces an alternative explanation for why researchers are emphasizing women's benefits - suggesting this focus stems from funding trends rather than the therapy's true potential.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The context about funding priorities suggests that the researchers' focus on women isn't necessarily because the drug is truly better for women, but because funding agencies are prioritizing women's health in 2023 and it's harder to get funding for general chronic illness research
  • This creates incentives to frame findings in terms of women's health benefits
  • The right answer should recognize that the emphasis on women reflects funding pressures rather than the drug's actual gender-specific effectiveness
Answer Choices Explained
A

the study's findings reflect the broader challenges facing chronic illness research rather than a gender-specific breakthrough in women's health treatment.

✓ Correct
  • This directly captures our prethinking - the findings reflect research funding challenges rather than a true women's health breakthrough
  • The phrase about broader challenges facing chronic illness research aligns with how funding priorities make general research harder to obtain
  • It correctly distinguishes between what the study shows versus how it's being presented
B

the drug's effectiveness in female participants demonstrates the success of prioritizing women's health research over general chronic illness studies.

✗ Incorrect
  • This misses the point entirely by celebrating the funding priority approach
  • The passage suggests the emphasis on women's benefits may be artificial, not evidence of successful prioritization
C

while the therapy shows promise for women with chronic fatigue syndrome, male participants' responses indicate the need for gender-specific treatment protocols.

✗ Incorrect
  • This focuses on the need for gender-specific protocols, which isn't what the funding context suggests
  • The context is about funding pressures influencing emphasis, not about developing different treatment approaches
D

the research is best understood as validating the funding agencies' focus on women's health rather than as evidence for broader therapeutic applications.

✗ Incorrect
  • This incorrectly suggests the research validates the funding focus, when the passage implies the opposite
  • The context is presented as potentially distorting the research emphasis, not confirming it was right
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.