prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Recent studies have documented alarming declines in kelp forest ecosystems along the Pacific coast. The research demonstrates that marine ______...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Recent studies have documented alarming declines in kelp forest ecosystems along the Pacific coast. The research demonstrates that marine ______ advocated for protection strategies decades before the current crisis became widely recognized.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

biologist, Nancy Foster,

B

biologist Nancy Foster

C

biologist, Nancy Foster

D

biologist Nancy Foster,

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Recent studies have documented alarming declines
    • in kelp forest ecosystems
      • along the Pacific coast.
  • The research demonstrates
    • that marine biologist [?] Nancy Foster advocated
      • for protection strategies
        • decades before the current crisis became widely recognized.

Understanding the Meaning

Let's start by reading the first sentence:

  • "Recent studies have documented alarming declines in kelp forest ecosystems along the Pacific coast."
    • This is straightforward - studies show that kelp forests along the Pacific coast are declining in concerning ways.

Now the second sentence:

  • "The research demonstrates that marine biologist..."

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:

  • A: biologist, Nancy Foster,
  • B: biologist Nancy Foster
  • C: biologist, Nancy Foster
  • D: biologist Nancy Foster,

So we're deciding whether to put commas before and/or after "Nancy Foster."

To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!

  • "marine biologist [?] Nancy Foster advocated for protection strategies decades before the current crisis became widely recognized."

Let me break down what this is telling us:

  • "marine biologist Nancy Foster"
    • We're talking about a specific marine biologist
    • Nancy Foster is the name of that person
  • "advocated for protection strategies decades before the current crisis became widely recognized"
    • This person was calling for protections long before people widely recognized there was a problem

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • We have a general term: "marine biologist"
    • There are many marine biologists out there
  • Followed by a specific name: "Nancy Foster"
    • This tells us WHICH marine biologist we're talking about
    • Without this name, we wouldn't know which biologist the sentence means
  • The name is ESSENTIAL information
    • It identifies who specifically we're discussing
    • It narrows down "marine biologist" to one specific person

When a name is essential to identify which person we're talking about - when we need it to know who specifically - we DON'T use commas. The name attaches directly to the noun.

Think of phrases like "my friend Sarah" or "author Toni Morrison" - no commas because the name is necessary to know which friend or which author.

So we need: biologist Nancy Foster (no commas)

The correct answer is Choice B.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Using Commas with Essential vs. Non-Essential Names

When you add a name after a noun, you need to decide whether that name is ESSENTIAL to identify which person you're talking about, or whether it's just EXTRA information about someone already clearly identified. This determines whether you use commas.

Pattern 1: Essential Identifying Name (called restrictive in grammar terms) → NO commas

The name is necessary to know which specific person you mean:

  • General noun + Specific name (directly attached, no commas)
  • Example: "marine biologist Nancy Foster"
  • "marine biologist" = general category (there are many)
  • "Nancy Foster" = essential to identify which one specifically
  • Without the name, we wouldn't know who the sentence is about

Pattern 2: Non-Essential Additional Information (called non-restrictive in grammar terms) → YES commas

The person is already clearly identified, and the name is just additional detail:

  • Unique identifier, Name, (set off with commas on both sides)
  • Example: "The lead researcher, Nancy Foster, made a discovery"
  • "The lead researcher" = already identifies a specific person (there's only one lead researcher)
  • "Nancy Foster" = extra information about who that is
  • We could remove the name and still know who: "The lead researcher made a discovery"

How this applies to our question:

In our sentence, "marine biologist" is a general category, and "Nancy Foster" is essential to identify which specific marine biologist advocated for protections. Therefore, we need no commas: "marine biologist Nancy Foster."

Answer Choices Explained
A

biologist, Nancy Foster,

✗ Incorrect

  • The commas on both sides treat "Nancy Foster" as extra, non-essential information - like something you could remove and still know who you're talking about
  • But we NEED the name to know which marine biologist the sentence is discussing
  • The commas incorrectly suggest the name is optional when it's actually essential
B

biologist Nancy Foster

✓ Correct

  • Correct as explained in the solution above.
C

biologist, Nancy Foster

✗ Incorrect

  • A comma before the name only creates an incorrect punctuation pattern
  • If the name were non-essential information, we'd need commas on BOTH sides to set it off properly
  • The single comma disrupts the flow without serving any grammatical purpose
  • It creates an inconsistent structure
D

biologist Nancy Foster,

✗ Incorrect

  • The comma after "Foster" separates the subject ("marine biologist Nancy Foster") from its verb ("advocated")
  • This is a major punctuation error - we never put a comma between a subject and its verb
  • It breaks up the essential connection between who is doing the action and what action they're doing
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.