prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Recognized as one of the most innovative composers of the Classical period, Ludwig _____ a Viennese musician who pioneered the...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Recognized as one of the most innovative composers of the Classical period, Ludwig _____ a Viennese musician who pioneered the integration of folk melodies into symphonic structures, influenced generations of later composers including Brahms and Dvořák.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

Fischer:

B

Fischer,

C

Fischer

D

Fischer-

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Recognized as one of the most innovative composers of the Classical period,
    • Ludwig Fischer [?]
      • a Viennese musician
        • who pioneered the integration of folk melodies into symphonic structures,
    • influenced generations of later composers
      • including Brahms and Dvořák.

Understanding the Meaning

The sentence opens with a description:

  • 'Recognized as one of the most innovative composers of the Classical period'
    • This is telling us how Ludwig Fischer is viewed/regarded

Now we meet the subject:

  • 'Ludwig Fischer'
    • This is who the sentence is about

This is where we have the blank.

Let's look at the choices:

  • A colon, a comma, nothing, or a dash after Fischer's name

To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!

The sentence continues with more information about Fischer:

  • 'a Viennese musician who pioneered the integration of folk melodies into symphonic structures'
    • This is giving us additional descriptive details about who Fischer was
    • He was from Vienna
    • He did something innovative with folk melodies in symphonies

Then we get the main action:

  • 'influenced generations of later composers including Brahms and Dvořák'
    • This tells us what Fischer DID - his impact
    • He influenced other famous composers

Now let's understand what this structure is doing:

  • 'Ludwig Fischer' = the subject (who the sentence is about)
  • 'a Viennese musician who pioneered...' = extra descriptive information about Fischer
    • This phrase is giving us bonus details about who he was
    • It's inserted between the subject and the main action
  • 'influenced' = the main verb (what Fischer did)

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • The descriptive phrase 'a Viennese musician...' sits between the subject and its verb
    • If we removed it, we'd have: 'Ludwig Fischer influenced generations of later composers'
    • That's a complete sentence!
  • This means the descriptive phrase is interrupting information - adding extra details in the middle
  • When you insert a descriptive noun phrase like this between a subject and its verb, it needs to be set off by commas on BOTH sides
    • One comma to open it
    • One comma to close it

Looking at the sentence again:

  • We need a comma after 'Fischer' to begin the descriptive phrase
  • There's already a comma after 'structures' to close the phrase
  • Then the sentence can continue to its main verb 'influenced'

So we need Fischer, - the comma creates the proper opening for this interrupting descriptive phrase.

The correct answer is B.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Using Commas with Descriptive Noun Phrases That Interrupt

When you add a descriptive noun phrase (called an appositive in grammar terms) that provides extra, non-essential information about a noun, and this phrase appears in the middle of a sentence - interrupting the flow from subject to verb - it must be set off by commas on both sides.

The pattern:

  • Subject, [descriptive noun phrase], verb...
  • The descriptive phrase can be removed and you still have a complete sentence
  • The commas signal: 'Here's bonus information, then we'll get back to the main point'

Example 1:

  • Without the descriptive phrase: My sister graduated from Yale.
  • With the descriptive phrase: My sister, a talented engineer, graduated from Yale.
  • 'a talented engineer' = descriptive noun phrase
  • Set off by commas because it interrupts the subject-verb flow
  • Remove it and you still have: 'My sister graduated from Yale'

Example 2:

  • Without the descriptive phrase: The discovery changed the field forever.
  • With the descriptive phrase: The discovery, a breakthrough in quantum physics, changed the field forever.
  • 'a breakthrough in quantum physics' = descriptive noun phrase
  • Interrupts between subject and verb
  • Needs commas on both sides

In our question:

  • Subject: Ludwig Fischer
  • Descriptive phrase: a Viennese musician who pioneered the integration of folk melodies into symphonic structures
  • Verb: influenced
  • The descriptive phrase interrupts between subject and verb, so it needs commas on both sides
  • The comma after 'Fischer' opens this interrupting phrase
  • The comma after 'structures' closes it
  • Then the sentence continues to its main verb
Answer Choices Explained
A

Fischer:

✗ Incorrect

  • A colon signals that what follows will explain, define, or provide a list related to what came before
  • Here, 'a Viennese musician...' isn't explaining the opening phrase about being innovative - it's adding separate descriptive information about Fischer himself
  • Additionally, the sentence needs to continue to its main verb 'influenced,' and a colon would disrupt this flow
  • Colons don't work for setting off descriptive noun phrases that interrupt subject-verb flow
B

Fischer,

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

C

Fischer

✗ Incorrect

  • Without punctuation, 'Ludwig Fischer a Viennese musician who pioneered...' runs together incorrectly
  • The descriptive phrase needs to be separated to signal it's additional, non-essential information
  • This creates a grammatical error - the sentence becomes unclear and improperly structured
D

Fischer-

✗ Incorrect

  • A dash could potentially introduce additional information, but dashes that set off mid-sentence information must come in pairs
  • There's no closing dash after 'structures' (there's a comma instead)
  • You can't open with a dash and close with a comma - this creates an incomplete, mismatched structure
  • The punctuation marks must match when they're setting off interrupting information
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.