prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Renaissance painters developed tempera by mixing pigment with egg yolk, creating a fast-drying medium ideal for detailed ______ painters of...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Renaissance painters developed tempera by mixing pigment with egg yolk, creating a fast-drying medium ideal for detailed ______ painters of the same era, oil-based paints allowed for slower drying times and enabled the blending techniques that became central to their artistic style.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

work, with

B

work and with

C

work. With

D

work with

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Renaissance painters
    • developed tempera
      • by mixing pigment with egg yolk,
      • creating a fast-drying medium
        • ideal for detailed work [?]
  • With painters of the same era,
  • oil-based paints
    • allowed for slower drying times
    • and enabled the blending techniques
      • that became central to their artistic style.

Understanding the Meaning

Let's start reading and understanding what this passage is telling us:

'Renaissance painters developed tempera by mixing pigment with egg yolk'

  • This tells us about a painting technique
    • Renaissance painters created a type of paint called tempera
    • They made it by mixing pigment (color) with egg yolk

'creating a fast-drying medium ideal for detailed work'

  • This describes what made tempera special
    • It dried quickly
    • This quick drying made it great for detailed work

This is where we have the blank: 'detailed work ___'

Let's look at the choices:

  • A: work, with
  • B: work and with
  • C: work. With
  • D: work with

So we're deciding on punctuation - what goes between "work" and "with"?

To see what works here, let's read the rest and understand what it's saying!

'With painters of the same era, oil-based paints allowed for slower drying times and enabled the blending techniques that became central to their artistic style.'

Now let's really understand what this part is telling us:

  • 'With painters of the same era'
    • This means other painters who lived at the same time as the Renaissance painters
  • 'oil-based paints allowed for slower drying times'
    • These painters used a different type of paint - oil-based
    • This paint dried more slowly (contrasting with the fast-drying tempera)
  • 'and enabled the blending techniques that became central to their artistic style'
    • The slow drying time let them blend colors
    • This blending became a key part of how they painted

So the complete picture is:

  • Renaissance painters used fast-drying tempera for detailed work
  • Other painters of that era used slow-drying oil-based paints for blending

Now, what do we notice about the structure here?

  • The first part - about Renaissance painters and tempera - is a complete thought that could stand alone as its own sentence
    • It has a subject (Renaissance painters)
    • It has a verb (developed)
    • It expresses a complete idea
  • The second part - about oil-based paints - is ALSO a complete thought that could stand alone
    • It has a subject (oil-based paints)
    • It has verbs (allowed and enabled)
    • It expresses a complete idea
    • Even though it starts with "With painters of the same era," that's just extra information at the beginning - the core sentence is "oil-based paints allowed for slower drying times and enabled..."

When you have two complete sentences - two complete thoughts that could each stand alone - you need to separate them properly. The cleanest way to do this is with a period, making them two distinct sentences.

So we need: C. work. With

This gives us: "...ideal for detailed work. With painters of the same era, oil-based paints..."


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Separating Two Complete Sentences

When you have two complete thoughts (called independent clauses in grammar terms) - each with its own subject and verb that could stand alone as a sentence - you must separate them properly. You have several options:

Option 1: Use a period (most common and clearest)

  • Complete sentence. Complete sentence.
  • Example: "The researchers discovered a new species. They published their findings immediately."

Option 2: Use a semicolon

  • Complete sentence; complete sentence.
  • Example: "The researchers discovered a new species; they published their findings immediately."

Option 3: Use a comma + coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, nor, for, yet, so)

  • Complete sentence, and complete sentence.
  • Example: "The researchers discovered a new species, and they published their findings immediately."

What you CANNOT do:

  • Complete sentence, complete sentence. (comma splice)
  • Complete sentence complete sentence. (run-on)

In our question:

  • First complete sentence: "Renaissance painters developed tempera by mixing pigment with egg yolk, creating a fast-drying medium ideal for detailed work."
  • Second complete sentence: "With painters of the same era, oil-based paints allowed for slower drying times and enabled the blending techniques that became central to their artistic style."
  • Solution: Use a period to separate them clearly

Note: The phrase "With painters of the same era" at the start of the second sentence might make it seem like it's not complete, but it is! The core sentence is "oil-based paints allowed for slower drying times..." - that introductory phrase is just additional information (called an introductory prepositional phrase) that modifies the main sentence.

Answer Choices Explained
A

work, with

✗ Incorrect

  • This creates what's called a comma splice - using just a comma to connect two complete sentences
  • A comma isn't strong enough punctuation to separate two complete thoughts
  • This violates a fundamental rule: independent sentences need proper separation
B

work and with

✗ Incorrect

  • The word "and" suggests we're continuing the same sentence with parallel or connected elements
  • But "with painters of the same era" isn't parallel to "detailed work" - they're not the same type of phrase
  • This creates awkward, unclear meaning
  • The "with painters" phrase is actually starting a new sentence about a different group, not continuing information about detailed work
C

work. With

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

D

work with

✗ Incorrect

  • This uses no punctuation at all, creating a run-on sentence
  • Two complete sentences cannot be joined together with no punctuation between them
  • This makes the passage difficult to read and grammatically incorrect
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.