prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Research conducted by Dr. Patricia Chen and her team examining publications in the Journal of Applied Psychology from 2015 through...

GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions

Source: Prism
Information and Ideas
Inferences
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Research conducted by Dr. Patricia Chen and her team examining publications in the Journal of Applied Psychology from 2015 through 2020 demonstrates a troubling deterioration in research methodology standards over this period: publications from 2015 maintained an average of 850 study participants with 89% utilizing appropriate control groups, while by 2020, publications averaged merely 340 participants with only 67% implementing sufficient controls, resulting in significant statistical power deficiencies that reviewers routinely identified. Given the journal's established policy mandating minimum statistical requirements for publication approval, Chen and colleagues hypothesize that a credibility crisis developed circa 2020, which was presumably resolved—notwithstanding the journal's ongoing budgetary limitations constraining review resources—when incoming editor-in-chief Dr. Martinez chose to ______

Which choice most logically completes the text?

A

preserve existing sample size requirements while enforcing more rigorous control group criteria that could be assessed through current review protocols.

B

elevate the minimum sample size threshold beyond the levels mandated in 2015.

C

mandate larger sample sizes while preserving the control group criteria utilized in 2020 publications.

D

create funding to assist researchers lacking adequate training in control group methodologies.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Part A: Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
Research conducted by Dr. Patricia Chen and her team examining publications in the Journal of Applied Psychology from 2015 through 2020 demonstrates a troubling deterioration in research methodology standards over this period:
  • What it says: Chen study: methodology standards declined 2015-2020
  • What it does: Introduces the research findings about declining standards
  • What it is: Opening context/research finding
publications from 2015 maintained an average of 850 study participants with 89% utilizing appropriate control groups,
  • What it says: 2015: 850 participants avg, 89% proper controls
  • What it does: Provides specific baseline data for the starting point
  • What it is: Quantitative evidence
while by 2020, publications averaged merely 340 participants with only 67% implementing sufficient controls,
  • What it says: 2020: 340 participants avg, 67% controls
  • What it does: Contrasts with the 2015 data to show decline
  • What it is: Comparative evidence
resulting in significant statistical power deficiencies that reviewers routinely identified.
  • What it says: low power, reviewers noticed problems
  • What it does: Explains the consequences of the declining standards
  • What it is: Causal outcome
Given the journal's established policy mandating minimum statistical requirements for publication approval,
  • What it says: journal has min stats requirements
  • What it does: Provides context about journal's existing standards
  • What it is: Policy context
Chen and colleagues hypothesize that a credibility crisis developed circa 2020,
  • What it says: Chen: credibility crisis around 2020
  • What it does: States the researchers' interpretation of events
  • What it is: Hypothesis/interpretation
which was presumably resolved when incoming editor-in-chief Dr. Martinez chose to ______
  • What it says: crisis resolved by Martinez's action
  • What it does: Sets up the question about what action resolved the crisis
  • What it is: Missing conclusion

Part B: Core Understanding

Main Point: Research shows the Journal of Applied Psychology experienced declining methodology standards from 2015-2020, creating a credibility crisis that was resolved when editor Martinez took action within budgetary constraints.

Key Problem: Both sample sizes (850 to 340) and control group usage (89% to 67%) declined significantly, creating statistical power issues.

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • The correct answer must address the specific problems: declining sample sizes and fewer proper control groups
  • However, it must work within budgetary limitations that constrain review resources
  • The solution should target the most serious issue that can be fixed without dramatically increasing review burden
Answer Choices Explained
A

preserve existing sample size requirements while enforcing more rigorous control group criteria that could be assessed through current review protocols.

  • Addresses control group problem while working within existing review constraints
  • This improves standards without adding review burden
B

elevate the minimum sample size threshold beyond the levels mandated in 2015.

  • Would require more extensive review of larger studies
  • Contradicting the budgetary limitations
C

mandate larger sample sizes while preserving the control group criteria utilized in 2020 publications.

  • Preserves the problematic 2020 control group criteria
  • Not actually solving the credibility crisis
D

create funding to assist researchers lacking adequate training in control group methodologies.

  • Creating funding contradicts the ongoing budgetary limitations mentioned in the passage
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.