prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Research conducted by marine biologists ______ revealed that coral reefs possess remarkable regenerative capabilities previously unknown to science.

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Research conducted by marine biologists ______ revealed that coral reefs possess remarkable regenerative capabilities previously unknown to science.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

marine biologists, Elena Rodriguez and James Chen

B

marine biologists: Elena Rodriguez and James Chen,

C

marine biologists Elena Rodriguez and James Chen

D

marine biologists Elena Rodriguez, and James Chen,

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Research
    • conducted by marine biologists [?]
  • revealed that coral reefs possess remarkable regenerative capabilities
    • previously unknown to science

Understanding the Meaning

The sentence starts by telling us about some research:

  • 'Research conducted by marine biologists...'

Now here's where we have the blank. Let's look at our choices:

  • A: marine biologists, Elena Rodriguez and James Chen
  • B: marine biologists: Elena Rodriguez and James Chen,
  • C: marine biologists Elena Rodriguez and James Chen
  • D: marine biologists Elena Rodriguez, and James Chen,

So we're deciding how to punctuate these two names.

To see what works here, let's read the complete sentence and understand what it's telling us:

  • The research 'revealed that coral reefs possess remarkable regenerative capabilities previously unknown to science.'
    • So this is about a discovery - that coral reefs can regenerate themselves in ways scientists didn't know before.

Now let's understand the role of these names in the sentence:

  • 'Marine biologists' tells us the type of researchers
  • 'Elena Rodriguez and James Chen' tells us specifically which marine biologists
    • These names directly identify who conducted the research
    • They're not extra information - they're essential specification

What do we notice about this structure?

  • When a noun is directly followed by names that identify that specific noun, no punctuation separates them
  • It's like saying 'President Lincoln' or 'Doctor Smith'
    • The name directly specifies which person
    • No comma between the title and the name

So we need: marine biologists Elena Rodriguez and James Chen

The correct answer is Choice C.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Using Names to Directly Identify a Noun

When a noun is immediately followed by a name or names that directly identify that specific noun, no punctuation separates them:

Pattern: Noun + Identifying Name(s) = No punctuation

  • Example 1: The author Mark Twain wrote many classic novels
    • 'author' = the noun
    • 'Mark Twain' = the name that identifies which author
    • No comma between them
  • Example 2: The planets Jupiter and Saturn are gas giants
    • 'planets' = the noun
    • 'Jupiter and Saturn' = the names that identify which planets
    • No comma between them
  • In this question: marine biologists Elena Rodriguez and James Chen
    • 'marine biologists' = the noun
    • 'Elena Rodriguez and James Chen' = the names that identify which biologists
    • No punctuation needed

Important distinction (called restrictive vs. non-restrictive modification in grammar terms):

  • If the names are essential to know who you're talking about → no punctuation
  • If you already know who you're talking about and the names just add extra detail → use commas
  • Example with commas: "The two lead researchers, Elena Rodriguez and James Chen, published their findings."
  • (Here "the two lead researchers" already specifies who, so names are extra information)
Answer Choices Explained
A

marine biologists, Elena Rodriguez and James Chen

✗ Incorrect

  • The comma suggests the names are additional/extra information (like a parenthetical comment)
  • But the names are essential identification - they specify which marine biologists did this research
  • The comma incorrectly treats this as non-essential information that could be removed
B

marine biologists: Elena Rodriguez and James Chen,

✗ Incorrect

  • The colon is incorrect here - colons are used after complete thoughts to introduce lists or explanations
  • 'Research conducted by marine biologists' is not a complete thought that can stand alone as a sentence
  • The comma after 'Chen' is also wrong - it unnecessarily separates the names from the rest of the sentence
C

marine biologists Elena Rodriguez and James Chen

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

D

marine biologists Elena Rodriguez, and James Chen,

✗ Incorrect

  • The comma after 'Rodriguez' disrupts the simple pairing of two names
  • When listing just two items connected with 'and,' no comma is needed before the 'and'
  • The comma after 'Chen' is also incorrect - it creates an unnecessary separation
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.