prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Text 1Stage lighting theorist Adolphe Appia was perhaps the first to argue that light must be considered alongside all the...

GMAT Craft and Structure : (Structure) Questions

Source: Official
Craft and Structure
Cross-Text Connections
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Text 1

Stage lighting theorist Adolphe Appia was perhaps the first to argue that light must be considered alongside all the various elements of a stage to create a single, unified performance. Researcher Kelly Bremner, however, has noted that Appia lacked technical expertise in the use of light in the theater. As a result of Appia's inexperience, Bremner argues, Appia's theory of light called for lighting practices that weren't possible until after the advent of electricity around 1881.

Text 2

Adolphe Appia was not an amateur in the practice of lighting. Instead, it is precisely his exposure to lighting techniques at the time that contributed to his theory on the importance of light. When working as an apprentice for a lighting specialist in his youth, Appia observed the use of portable lighting devices that could be operated by hand. This experience developed his understanding of what was possible in the coordination of elements on the stage.

Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the claim about Appia's level of technical expertise made by Bremner in Text 1?

A

Many lighting technicians dismissed Appia's ideas about light on the stage.

B

Appia likely gained a level of technical expertise during his time as an apprentice.

C

Theater practitioners who worked with Appia greatly admired his work.

D

Appia was unfamiliar with the use of music and sound in theater.

Solution

Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage

Create Passage Analysis Table

Text from PassageAnalysis
Text 1: Appia was first to argue light must be considered alongside all stage elements for unified performance
  • What it says: Appia = 1st to say light + all stage elements = unified show.
  • What it does: Introduces Appia and his main contribution.
  • What it is: Background context
Bremner noted that Appia lacked technical expertise in use of light in theater
  • What it says: Bremner says Appia = no tech skills with lighting.
  • What it does: Presents criticism contrasting with reputation.
  • What it is: Critical claim
As result of inexperience, Appia's theory called for lighting practices not possible until after electricity around 1881
  • What it says: Bremner argues lack of experience made theory impractical until electricity.
  • What it does: Explains consequences of claimed inexperience.
  • What it is: Supporting evidence
Text 2: Appia was not an amateur in the practice of lighting
  • What it says: Appia not amateur in lighting practice.
  • What it does: Directly contradicts Text 1 claim about expertise.
  • What it is: Counter-claim
His exposure to lighting techniques contributed to his theory on importance of light
  • What it says: Exposure to techniques helped develop theory.
  • What it does: Explains how experience informed theoretical work.
  • What it is: Cause-effect explanation
Working as apprentice for lighting specialist, Appia observed portable lighting devices operated by hand
  • What it says: Youth apprenticeship with specialist, saw handheld lights.
  • What it does: Provides specific evidence of technical training.
  • What it is: Concrete evidence
This experience developed his understanding of stage coordination possibilities
  • What it says: Experience led to understanding of coordination.
  • What it does: Connects training to theoretical insights.
  • What it is: Impact conclusion

Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely

What's being asked? The question asks how the author of Text 2 would respond to Bremner's specific claim about Appia's level of technical expertise.

What type of answer do we need? We need a response reflecting Text 2's perspective on this expertise issue.

Any limiting keywords? The question asks how the author of Text 2 would respond to Bremner's specific claim about Appia's level of technical expertise.

Step 3: Prethink the Answer

  • Text 2's author would challenge Bremner's characterization by pointing to specific evidence that Appia did have hands-on experience through his apprenticeship with a lighting specialist
  • The author argues this practical experience was valuable and contributed to theoretical understanding
Answer Choices Explained
A

Many lighting technicians dismissed Appia's ideas about light on the stage.

The correct answer should show Text 2's author would point to Appia's apprenticeship as evidence he did have technical expertise, directly contradicting Bremner's claim.

B

Appia likely gained a level of technical expertise during his time as an apprentice.

The correct answer should show Text 2's author would point to Appia's apprenticeship as evidence he did have technical expertise, directly contradicting Bremner's claim.

C

Theater practitioners who worked with Appia greatly admired his work.

The correct answer should show Text 2's author would point to Appia's apprenticeship as evidence he did have technical expertise, directly contradicting Bremner's claim.

D

Appia was unfamiliar with the use of music and sound in theater.

The correct answer should show Text 2's author would point to Appia's apprenticeship as evidence he did have technical expertise, directly contradicting Bremner's claim.

Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.