That the geographic center of North America lay in the state of North Dakota was conceded by all ________ establishing...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
That the geographic center of North America lay in the state of North Dakota was conceded by all ________ establishing its precise coordinates proved more divisive.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
involved:
involved,
involved
involved;
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- That the geographic center of North America lay in the state of North Dakota
- was conceded by all involved(?);
- establishing its precise coordinates
- proved more divisive.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
'That the geographic center of North America lay in the state of North Dakota'
- This is what the sentence is about - a fact about North America's geographic center being in North Dakota.
'was conceded by all involved'
- This tells us that everyone agreed on this point - there was no dispute about the center being in North Dakota.
So the first part gives us: everyone agreed that North Dakota contains the geographic center of North America.
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- We're deciding what punctuation (if any) should come after 'involved'
- The options are: colon, comma, no punctuation, or semicolon
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
'establishing its precise coordinates proved more divisive'
- 'establishing its precise coordinates' - this means figuring out the exact latitude and longitude
- 'proved more divisive' - this means caused more disagreement or dispute
So this part tells us: when people tried to pin down the EXACT location with specific coordinates, that's when disagreement arose.
The complete picture:
- First statement: Everyone agreed North Dakota contains the center (no problem there)
- Second statement: But finding the precise coordinates caused disputes (this was controversial)
What do we notice about the structure here?
- The first part is a complete thought that could stand alone: 'That the geographic center...was conceded by all involved.'
- It has a subject and verb
- It expresses a complete idea
- The second part is also a complete thought that could stand alone: 'Establishing its precise coordinates proved more divisive.'
- It has its own subject ('establishing its precise coordinates')
- It has its own verb ('proved')
- It expresses a complete idea
- These two complete thoughts are closely related - they're both about the same topic (the geographic center), and they present a contrast (agreement vs. disagreement)
When we have two complete thoughts that are closely related and we want to connect them without using a word like 'and' or 'but,' we need a semicolon to join them properly.
So we need: Choice D (involved;)
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Connecting Two Complete Thoughts with a Semicolon
When you have two complete sentences (called independent clauses in grammar terms) that are closely related in meaning, and you want to connect them without using a connecting word like 'and' or 'but,' you should use a semicolon:
Pattern:
- Complete thought 1 ; Complete thought 2
Example 1:
- The committee approved the budget; the project could finally begin.
- First part: "The committee approved the budget" (complete thought - has subject and verb)
- Second part: "the project could finally begin" (complete thought - has subject and verb)
- Related ideas connected with semicolon
Example 2:
- Students preferred the morning sessions; teachers found the afternoon ones more productive.
- Two contrasting but related complete thoughts
- Semicolon shows they're connected ideas without needing 'but' or 'however'
In our question:
- "That the geographic center...was conceded by all involved" (complete thought)
- "establishing its precise coordinates proved more divisive" (complete thought)
- These are closely related ideas about the same topic, presenting a contrast
- Semicolon properly connects them
Key distinction:
- Use a comma + and/but/so if you want to use a connecting word
- Use a semicolon if you're connecting them without a connecting word
- Don't use just a comma alone - that creates a comma splice error
involved:
(involved:)
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce something that explains, elaborates on, or lists what comes before
- Here, the second part doesn't explain "all involved" - instead, it makes a contrasting point about a different aspect of the situation
- The relationship between these two thoughts is contrast, not explanation, so a colon doesn't fit
involved,
(involved,)
✗ Incorrect
- A comma alone cannot connect two complete thoughts without a connecting word like 'and,' 'but,' or 'so'
- Using just a comma here creates what's called a comma splice - a type of run-on sentence error
- We need stronger punctuation to properly separate these two complete statements
involved
(involved)
✗ Incorrect
- No punctuation at all creates a fused sentence - another type of run-on error
- Two complete sentences cannot simply run into each other without any punctuation or connecting word
- This makes the sentence grammatically incorrect and confusing to read
involved;
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.