The 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to three pioneers in the field of click chemistry: two-time Nobel laureate...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to three pioneers in the field of click chemistry: two-time Nobel laureate Barry Sharpless, who coined the term 'click chemistry' in 1998; Carolyn Bertozzi, founder of the Bertozzi Group at ________ and Morten Meldal, a professor at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Stanford
Stanford,
Stanford:
Stanford;
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
- was awarded to three pioneers in the field of click chemistry:
- two-time Nobel laureate Barry Sharpless,
- who coined the term 'click chemistry' in 1998;
- Carolyn Bertozzi,
- founder of the Bertozzi Group at Stanford(?);
- and Morten Meldal,
- a professor at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.
- two-time Nobel laureate Barry Sharpless,
- was awarded to three pioneers in the field of click chemistry:
Understanding the Meaning
The sentence starts by telling us about an award:
- The 2022 Nobel Prize in Chemistry
- was given to three pioneers in click chemistry
Then we get a colon, which signals that the sentence is about to list these three pioneers:
First person:
- "two-time Nobel laureate Barry Sharpless,"
- Barry Sharpless is identified as a two-time Nobel laureate
- Additional detail: "who coined the term 'click chemistry' in 1998"
- This description ends with a semicolon
Second person:
- "Carolyn Bertozzi,"
- She's identified as "founder of the Bertozzi Group at Stanford"
- This is where we have the blank
Let's look at the choices:
- We need to decide what punctuation (if any) should follow "Stanford"
- Choice A: no punctuation
- Choice B: comma
- Choice C: colon
- Choice D: semicolon
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
Third person:
- "and Morten Meldal,"
- Identified as "a professor at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark"
- The sentence ends with a period
Now let's look at the complete structure. What do we notice?
- This is a three-item list introduced by the colon:
- Item 1: Barry Sharpless (with his description)
- Item 2: Carolyn Bertozzi (with her description)
- Item 3: Morten Meldal (with his description)
- Each item contains its own commas:
- "two-time Nobel laureate Barry Sharpless, who coined..."
- "Carolyn Bertozzi, founder of..."
- "Morten Meldal, a professor..."
- The first item ends with a semicolon
- The third item begins with "and"
This tells us the pattern:
- When list items are complex and contain their own internal commas,
- we use semicolons to separate the major list items
- this keeps things clear - we can tell which commas are within an item's description and which marks separate the main items
- The pattern here is: Item 1; Item 2; and Item 3
So we need a semicolon after Stanford to match the structure. The correct answer is Choice D: Stanford;
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Semicolons to Separate Complex List Items
When you have a list where each item contains its own commas or other internal punctuation, use semicolons to separate the major items (this is called a complex series). This creates clear boundaries between the main elements:
Simple list (items without internal commas):
- We invited Maria, John, and Sarah.
- Commas work fine here because each item is simple
Complex list (items with internal commas):
- We invited Maria, our neighbor from Boston; John, my college roommate; and Sarah, the team captain.
- Semicolons separate the three people
- Commas within each item provide additional description
The pattern:
- Item 1 (with internal comma); Item 2 (with internal comma); and Item 3 (with internal comma).
In our question:
- Barry Sharpless, who coined the term 'click chemistry' in 1998;
- Carolyn Bertozzi, founder of the Bertozzi Group at Stanford;
- and Morten Meldal, a professor at the University of Copenhagen
Each person's description contains commas, so semicolons separate the three main list items, keeping the structure clear and organized.
Stanford
✗ Incorrect
- No punctuation creates a run-on
- Without any separation, the sentence runs together: "founder of the Bertozzi Group at Stanford and Morten Meldal"
- This makes it unclear where Bertozzi's description ends and Meldal's description begins
Stanford,
✗ Incorrect
- A comma doesn't provide enough separation
- Since each list item already contains internal commas (like "Carolyn Bertozzi, founder..."), using just another comma here creates confusion
- We can't tell which commas are separating list items from each other and which commas are just part of the descriptions within each item
Stanford:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon would incorrectly suggest that what follows is an explanation or elaboration of Stanford
- But "and Morten Meldal, a professor..." isn't explaining anything about Stanford
- It's introducing the third person in the list, not providing more information about the university
Stanford;
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.