The assembly line process, a manufacturing innovation that _____ by the sequential arrangement of workers and machinery, revolutionized industrial pro...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The assembly line process, a manufacturing innovation that _____ by the sequential arrangement of workers and machinery, revolutionized industrial production in the early twentieth century.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
will be characterized
is characterized
characterized
has been characterized
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The assembly line process,
- a manufacturing innovation
- that [?] by the sequential arrangement
- of workers and machinery,
- that [?] by the sequential arrangement
- a manufacturing innovation
- revolutionized industrial production
- in the early twentieth century.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading naturally:
"The assembly line process"
- This is what we're talking about - a specific manufacturing method.
Then we get a comma and descriptive information:
- "a manufacturing innovation that _____ by the sequential arrangement of workers and machinery"
- This phrase is telling us MORE about what the assembly line process is
- It's defining or characterizing it
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- will be characterized (future)
- is characterized (present)
- characterized (no helping verb)
- has been characterized (present perfect)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
"revolutionized industrial production in the early twentieth century"
- This tells us what the assembly line process DID
- It changed industrial production
- This happened in the past (early twentieth century)
Now let's understand the complete structure:
- The main action of the sentence: "revolutionized industrial production"
- This is what the assembly line process DID in the past
- This is the primary verb - past tense makes sense because it happened in the early 1900s
- The phrase with our blank: "a manufacturing innovation that _____ by the sequential arrangement..."
- This is NOT the main action
- This is DESCRIBING what the assembly line process IS
- It's giving us a definition or characteristic
What do we notice about what we need here?
- Even though the MAIN ACTION happened in the past (revolutionized),
- The blank is asking us to DEFINE what characterizes the assembly line process
- When we state timeless definitions or describe what something IS,
- we use present tense - it's true now just as it was then
Also notice "by the sequential arrangement" - this signals we need passive voice:
- The process IS characterized BY something (the arrangement does the characterizing)
So we need: is characterized - present tense, passive voice
The answer is Choice B.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Main Verbs vs. Descriptive Verbs: Choosing the Right Tense
When a sentence has multiple verb forms, we need to distinguish between:
- The main verb - expresses the primary action of the sentence
- Takes the tense appropriate to when that action occurred
- Descriptive verbs - provide defining characteristics or background information
- Use present tense for timeless facts, even when the main action is in the past
Example from our question:
- Main verb: "revolutionized" (past tense) - the primary action that happened in the early 1900s
- Descriptive verb: "is characterized" (present tense) - defines what the assembly line process IS (timeless fact)
Pattern:
[Subject], [descriptive phrase about what it IS], [main verb describing what it DID]
The assembly line process, a manufacturing innovation that IS characterized by sequential arrangement, revolutionized production.
Another example:
- "The smartphone, a device that is defined by its touchscreen interface, transformed communication in the 2000s."
- Main action (what it DID): transformed (past)
- Definition (what it IS): is defined (present)
Key principle: Definitions and inherent characteristics exist in a timeless present, regardless of when the main action occurred. This applies to descriptive phrases (called relative clauses in grammar terms) that explain "what something is" rather than "what something did."
will be characterized
(will be characterized):
✗ Incorrect
- Uses future tense, which doesn't make logical sense here
- We're stating a timeless fact about what the assembly line process IS, not predicting what it will be in the future
- The characteristic has always existed and continues to exist - it's not something that will happen later
is characterized
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
characterized
(characterized):
✗ Incorrect
- This lacks the helping verb needed to create a complete verb phrase
- In this sentence structure, we need "is characterized" to make grammatical sense
- Standing alone without "is," this creates an incomplete construction
has been characterized
(has been characterized):
✗ Incorrect
- Uses present perfect tense, which emphasizes an action that started in the past and continues, or stresses completion
- But we're not describing an action or process - we're stating a simple, timeless definition
- Present perfect is unnecessarily complicated for what should be a straightforward present-tense statement of fact