The board of directors initially voted to expand operations into international markets through aggressive _____ pursuing a more cautious strategy...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The board of directors initially voted to expand operations into international markets through aggressive _____ pursuing a more cautious strategy of organic growth and partnership development after consulting with regional experts.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
acquisition; rather
acquisition rather
acquisition, rather
acquisition; rather,
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The board of directors
- initially voted to expand operations
- into international markets
- through aggressive acquisition [?] rather pursuing a more cautious strategy
- of organic growth
- and partnership development
- after consulting with regional experts.
- initially voted to expand operations
Understanding the Meaning
Let's read through this sentence and understand what it's telling us:
The board of directors initially voted to expand operations into international markets through aggressive acquisition...
So the board made an initial decision:
- They voted to expand into international markets
- Their method was going to be aggressive acquisition (buying other companies)
This is where we have the blank - and the word 'rather' appears in all the choices. Let's look at what varies:
- The punctuation before and/or after 'rather'
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
...rather pursuing a more cautious strategy of organic growth and partnership development after consulting with regional experts.
Now let's understand what this is telling us:
- 'Rather pursuing a more cautious strategy'
- The word 'rather' signals a shift or change from what was just mentioned
- Instead of aggressive acquisition, they're now pursuing a more cautious strategy
- 'Of organic growth and partnership development'
- This describes the cautious strategy - growing naturally and forming partnerships
- This contrasts with the aggressive acquisition approach mentioned first
- 'After consulting with regional experts'
- This tells us what prompted the change - they consulted experts first
So the complete picture is:
- The board initially planned one approach (aggressive acquisition)
- BUT they shifted to a different, more cautious approach (organic growth and partnerships)
- The word 'rather' signals this important shift in their decision
What do we notice about the structure here?
Let me check both parts around 'rather':
- The part before 'rather':
- 'The board of directors initially voted to expand operations into international markets through aggressive acquisition'
- This is a complete thought - it has a subject (board) and a verb (voted)
- It could stand alone as a sentence
- The part after 'rather':
- 'rather pursuing a more cautious strategy of organic growth and partnership development after consulting with regional experts'
- This is NOT a complete thought
- 'Pursuing' is a participle (a verb form used descriptively), not a main verb
- This is a phrase that shows the contrasting action
Since 'rather' is introducing a contrasting phrase (not a complete sentence on its own), we need a comma before it to signal this shift. We don't need a comma after 'rather' because it flows directly into what it's introducing.
The correct answer is Choice C: acquisition, rather
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Commas with Transitional Words that Introduce Contrasting Phrases
When you use a transitional word like 'rather' to introduce a contrasting or corrective phrase (not a complete independent clause) within a sentence, place a comma before the transitional word. This comma signals to the reader that a shift or contrast is coming.
The pattern:
- Complete thought + comma + transitional word + contrasting phrase
Example 1:
- The company planned to open five new stores, rather focusing its resources on improving existing locations.
- 'The company planned to open five new stores' = complete thought
- 'rather' = transitional word signaling the shift
- 'focusing its resources on improving existing locations' = contrasting phrase (not a complete sentence)
Example 2:
- She initially studied biology, rather pursuing a career in environmental policy.
- Complete thought + comma + 'rather' + contrasting phrase
In our question:
- 'The board of directors initially voted to expand operations into international markets through aggressive acquisition' = complete thought
- Comma needed before 'rather'
- 'pursuing a more cautious strategy...' = contrasting phrase describing what they did instead
Important distinction: If 'rather' were introducing a complete independent clause (with its own subject and main verb), you would use a semicolon. But when it introduces just a phrase, use a comma.
acquisition; rather
✗ Incorrect
- Uses a semicolon before 'rather'
- Semicolons are used to connect two independent clauses (complete sentences)
- But 'rather pursuing a more cautious strategy...' is NOT an independent clause - it doesn't have a main verb
- This violates the rule for semicolon usage
acquisition rather
✗ Incorrect
- Provides no punctuation before 'rather'
- This runs the contrasting element directly into what came before without separation
- The sentence becomes harder to read because the important shift in decision isn't clearly signaled
- Proper punctuation is needed to show the transition
acquisition, rather
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
acquisition; rather,
✗ Incorrect
- Has the same semicolon error as Choice A (connecting to a phrase instead of an independent clause)
- Also adds an unnecessary comma after 'rather'
- The comma after 'rather' awkwardly separates it from what it's introducing
- Creates choppy, incorrect punctuation