The city of Pompeii, which was buried in ash following the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE, continues to...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The city of Pompeii, which was buried in ash following the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE, continues to be studied by archaeologists. Unfortunately, as ________ attest, archaeological excavations have disrupted ash deposits at the site, causing valuable information about the eruption to be lost.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn,
researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
researchers Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
researchers Roberto Scandone, and Christopher Kilburn
Sentence Structure
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
- The city of Pompeii,
- which was buried in ash
- following the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE,
- which was buried in ash
- continues to be studied by archaeologists.
- Unfortunately,
- as ______ attest,
- [researchers (?) Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn (?)]
- archaeological excavations
- have disrupted ash deposits at the site,
- causing valuable information about the eruption to be lost.
- have disrupted ash deposits at the site,
- as ______ attest,
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start from the beginning to get the full context.
The first sentence tells us:
- The city of Pompeii was buried in ash when Mount Vesuvius erupted in 79 CE
- Archaeologists continue to study it today
Now the second sentence:
- "Unfortunately, as ______ attest..."
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- Choice A: researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn,
- Choice B: researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
- Choice C: researchers Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
- Choice D: researchers Roberto Scandone, and Christopher Kilburn
The choices are showing us different comma placements around these names. To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues:
- "archaeological excavations have disrupted ash deposits at the site, causing valuable information about the eruption to be lost."
So the complete meaning is:
- Two specific researchers (Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn) are confirming/testifying to a problem
- The problem is that archaeological excavations have messed up the ash layers at Pompeii
- This disruption has caused us to lose valuable information about how the eruption happened
What do we notice about the structure here?
The phrase "as researchers Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn attest" means "according to these two specific researchers."
- The word "researchers" is a general term
- The names "Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn" tell us exactly WHICH researchers we're talking about
- These names are essential - they identify the specific people
- Without the names, we'd just have "as researchers attest" which is too vague
- The names aren't extra information we could remove - they're necessary to specify who these researchers are
When names are essential identifiers like this - when they tell us which specific people we're referring to - we don't use commas to set them off.
Also notice: we're listing two names connected by "and"
- "Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn"
- With just two items, we don't put a comma before "and"
- Commas in lists are only for three or more items
So we need: researchers Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
The correct answer is Choice C.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Essential vs. Nonessential Information: When to Use Commas with Names
When a general noun is followed by specific names, whether you use commas depends on whether those names are essential to identify who/what you're talking about:
Essential identifiers (NO commas):
- When the names specify WHICH specific people from a larger group
- The researcher Roberto Scandone made a discovery
- "Roberto Scandone" is essential - it tells us which researcher
- The poets Byron and Shelley influenced Romanticism
- The names specify which poets
Nonessential information (USE commas):
- When the person is already clearly identified, and the name adds extra info
- My only colleague, Roberto, agreed with me
- "Only colleague" already identifies who - just one person
- The name "Roberto" is bonus information
- The author, writing under a pen name, became famous
- The description is extra detail, not essential identification
In this question:
- "researchers Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn" uses no commas
- The names are essential - they identify WHICH specific researchers from all possible researchers
- Without the names, "as researchers attest" would be too vague
Bonus rule: When listing two items, don't use a comma before "and"
- Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn (correct)
- Roberto Scandone, and Christopher Kilburn (incorrect)
- Commas in lists are only needed with three or more items
researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn,
researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn,
✗ Incorrect
- The commas before and after the names treat them as nonessential information - as if we could remove them and the sentence would still make sense
- But "as researchers attest" alone is too vague - we need to know WHICH researchers
- The names are essential identifiers, so they shouldn't be set off by commas
researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
researchers, Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
✗ Incorrect
- The comma after "researchers" incorrectly separates the general noun from the specific names that identify which researchers
- This suggests the names are additional information, but they're actually essential to specify who these researchers are
- The comma disrupts the connection between the noun and its essential identifiers
researchers Roberto Scandone and Christopher Kilburn
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
researchers Roberto Scandone, and Christopher Kilburn
researchers Roberto Scandone, and Christopher Kilburn
✗ Incorrect
- The comma before "and" is incorrect for a two-item list
- Commas before "and" are only used when you have three or more items (A, B, and C)
- This creates an error in how the two names are coordinated