The composer initially planned to complete the symphony by December. However, creative challenges meant that she finished the work _____...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The composer initially planned to complete the symphony by December. However, creative challenges meant that she finished the work _____ March while refining the final movements.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
later, which in
later, in
later in
later. In
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The composer initially planned
- to complete the symphony
- by December.
- to complete the symphony
- However, creative challenges meant
- that she finished the work [later (?)] March
- while refining the final movements.
- that she finished the work [later (?)] March
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
- 'The composer initially planned to complete the symphony by December.'
- The original plan was to finish by December.
- 'However, creative challenges meant'
- Things didn't go as planned
- The word "however" signals a change from the original plan
- "Meant" tells us we're about to learn what actually happened
Now we reach the blank: 'that she finished the work _____ March'
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- Choice A: later, which in
- Choice B: later, in
- Choice C: later in
- Choice D: later. In
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues: 'while refining the final movements.'
So the complete picture is:
- She planned to finish by December
- BUT she actually finished the work [something] March
- This happened while she was refining the final movements
Now, what phrase do we need to express when she finished?
We need to say she finished "later in March":
- "Later" tells us it happened after the planned December deadline
- "In March" specifies which month
- Together, they form one unified time phrase: "later in March"
What do we notice about this structure?
"Later in March" is a single, cohesive time expression:
- These words work together as one unit to tell us WHEN
- "Later" (than December) combines with "in March" to give us the complete timing
- There's no reason to break this phrase up with any punctuation
- They flow together naturally
So we need Choice C: "later in" - no punctuation interrupting the natural flow of this time phrase.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Punctuation Within Unified Phrases
When words work together as a single unit to express one idea, we don't use punctuation to separate them. This is especially important with time phrases:
Pattern: Unified time expression = No internal punctuation
Example 1:
- INCORRECT: "She arrived later, in the evening"
- CORRECT: "She arrived later in the evening"
- "Later in the evening" is one cohesive time phrase
Example 2:
- INCORRECT: "The meeting is scheduled early, next week"
- CORRECT: "The meeting is scheduled early next week"
- "Early next week" works as a single time expression
Example 3:
- INCORRECT: "They finished much, sooner than expected"
- CORRECT: "They finished much sooner than expected"
- "Much sooner" is a unified expression
In our question:
- "Later in March" = one unified time phrase
- No comma should interrupt the natural flow from "later" to "in March"
- These words work together to tell us when she finished the work
Additional note: Always check that periods create complete sentences on both sides. A period after "later" would leave us with "In March while refining the final movements" - which has no subject or main verb and cannot stand alone.
later, which in
✗ Incorrect
- The word "which" would need to introduce a descriptive clause, but "which in March" doesn't form a grammatically complete thought
- "Which" has no clear word it's modifying or relating to
- This creates a grammatically malformed construction
later, in
✗ Incorrect
- The comma unnecessarily breaks up the unified time phrase "later in March"
- Since "later" and "in March" work together as one unit to express timing, separating them with a comma disrupts their natural flow
- While not creating a major error, it adds awkward and incorrect punctuation
later in
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
later. In
✗ Incorrect
- The period would create a sentence fragment
- "In March while refining the final movements" cannot stand alone as a complete sentence
- It lacks both a subject and a main verb
- This violates the rule that periods should only come between complete independent thoughts