The discoveries made by astronomer Vera _____ provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe.
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The discoveries made by astronomer Vera _____ provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Rubin:
Rubin
Rubin,
Rubin—
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The discoveries
- made by astronomer Vera Rubin [?]
- provided crucial evidence
- for the existence of dark matter
- in the universe.
- for the existence of dark matter
Understanding the Meaning
Let's read through this sentence and understand what it's saying:
We're talking about "The discoveries"
specifically, discoveries "made by astronomer Vera Rubin"
This is where we have the blank.
Let's look at the choices:
- A. Rubin:
- B. Rubin (no punctuation)
- C. Rubin,
- D. Rubin—
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
After "Rubin" the sentence continues: "provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe."
So what's this sentence telling us?
- The discoveries (the ones made by Vera Rubin) did something
- They "provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter"
The complete picture: This is a sentence about what Rubin's discoveries accomplished - they gave us important evidence about dark matter.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- "The discoveries made by astronomer Vera Rubin" is the complete subject
- "made by astronomer Vera Rubin" describes which discoveries
- "provided" is the main verb - the action of the sentence
- This is what the discoveries DID
- After the describing phrase ends ("Rubin"), the sentence needs to flow directly to its main verb ("provided")
There's nothing being introduced, set off, or interrupted here - the sentence just continues naturally from the subject to its verb.
So we need no punctuation. The answer is B.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Maintaining Natural Sentence Flow: Subject to Verb
When a sentence has a clear subject-verb-object structure, don't insert punctuation that would interrupt the natural flow from the subject to the main verb.
The basic pattern:
- Subject (with any describing phrases) flows directly into Main Verb
- No punctuation between them
Example 1:
- The student, who studied every night, passed the exam.
- The student who studied every night passed the exam.
- If the phrase is essential to identify which student, no commas
Example 2:
- The research conducted by the team: revealed new findings.
- The research conducted by the team revealed new findings.
- Subject with modifier → verb (no punctuation break)
In our question:
- Subject: "The discoveries"
- Describing phrase: "made by astronomer Vera Rubin"
- Main verb: "provided"
- Structure: [Subject + describing phrase] → [verb] (no punctuation)
The key is recognizing when the sentence needs to flow continuously through its core structure without any punctuation interruption.
Rubin:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce something - an explanation, a list, or an elaboration
- Here, "provided crucial evidence" is not explaining "Rubin" - it's the main action of the sentence about the discoveries
- This would incorrectly suggest that what follows is explaining or elaborating on Rubin specifically
- It breaks the natural sentence structure
Rubin
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
Rubin,
✗ Incorrect
- A comma here would create an inappropriate interruption
- The phrase "made by astronomer Vera Rubin" has finished describing the discoveries, and now the sentence needs to move to its main verb
- Inserting a comma would awkwardly separate the subject from its verb
- This disrupts the natural flow of the sentence
Rubin—
✗ Incorrect
- A dash creates a dramatic pause or signals an interruption in thought
- Here, there's no interruption - the sentence flows naturally from describing which discoveries to stating what those discoveries did
- A dash would create an unnecessary and inappropriate break in the sentence's progression