prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

The discoveries made by astronomer Vera _____ provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe.

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
MEDIUM
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

The discoveries made by astronomer Vera _____ provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

Rubin:

B

Rubin

C

Rubin,

D

Rubin—

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • The discoveries
    • made by astronomer Vera Rubin [?]
  • provided crucial evidence
    • for the existence of dark matter
      • in the universe.

Understanding the Meaning

Let's read through this sentence and understand what it's saying:

We're talking about "The discoveries"
specifically, discoveries "made by astronomer Vera Rubin"

This is where we have the blank.

Let's look at the choices:

  • A. Rubin:
  • B. Rubin (no punctuation)
  • C. Rubin,
  • D. Rubin—

To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!

After "Rubin" the sentence continues: "provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe."

So what's this sentence telling us?

  • The discoveries (the ones made by Vera Rubin) did something
  • They "provided crucial evidence for the existence of dark matter"

The complete picture: This is a sentence about what Rubin's discoveries accomplished - they gave us important evidence about dark matter.

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • "The discoveries made by astronomer Vera Rubin" is the complete subject
    • "made by astronomer Vera Rubin" describes which discoveries
  • "provided" is the main verb - the action of the sentence
    • This is what the discoveries DID
  • After the describing phrase ends ("Rubin"), the sentence needs to flow directly to its main verb ("provided")

There's nothing being introduced, set off, or interrupted here - the sentence just continues naturally from the subject to its verb.

So we need no punctuation. The answer is B.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Maintaining Natural Sentence Flow: Subject to Verb

When a sentence has a clear subject-verb-object structure, don't insert punctuation that would interrupt the natural flow from the subject to the main verb.

The basic pattern:

  • Subject (with any describing phrases) flows directly into Main Verb
  • No punctuation between them

Example 1:

  • The student, who studied every night, passed the exam.
  • The student who studied every night passed the exam.
  • If the phrase is essential to identify which student, no commas

Example 2:

  • The research conducted by the team: revealed new findings.
  • The research conducted by the team revealed new findings.
  • Subject with modifier → verb (no punctuation break)

In our question:

  • Subject: "The discoveries"
  • Describing phrase: "made by astronomer Vera Rubin"
  • Main verb: "provided"
  • Structure: [Subject + describing phrase] → [verb] (no punctuation)

The key is recognizing when the sentence needs to flow continuously through its core structure without any punctuation interruption.

Answer Choices Explained
A

Rubin:

✗ Incorrect

  • A colon is used to introduce something - an explanation, a list, or an elaboration
  • Here, "provided crucial evidence" is not explaining "Rubin" - it's the main action of the sentence about the discoveries
  • This would incorrectly suggest that what follows is explaining or elaborating on Rubin specifically
  • It breaks the natural sentence structure
B

Rubin

✓ Correct

  • Correct as explained in the solution above.
C

Rubin,

✗ Incorrect

  • A comma here would create an inappropriate interruption
  • The phrase "made by astronomer Vera Rubin" has finished describing the discoveries, and now the sentence needs to move to its main verb
  • Inserting a comma would awkwardly separate the subject from its verb
  • This disrupts the natural flow of the sentence
D

Rubin—

✗ Incorrect

  • A dash creates a dramatic pause or signals an interruption in thought
  • Here, there's no interruption - the sentence flows naturally from describing which discoveries to stating what those discoveries did
  • A dash would create an unnecessary and inappropriate break in the sentence's progression
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.