The first exoplanet in the habitable zone was conclusively identified _____ astronomers at the European Southern Observatory, opening new possibilitie...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The first exoplanet in the habitable zone was conclusively identified _____ astronomers at the European Southern Observatory, opening new possibilities for discovering extraterrestrial life.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
by
by,
by:
by;
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The first exoplanet in the habitable zone
- was conclusively identified by(?) astronomers at the European Southern Observatory,
- opening new possibilities for discovering extraterrestrial life.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start from the beginning and understand what this sentence is telling us:
The sentence is about a significant discovery:
- 'The first exoplanet in the habitable zone'
- An exoplanet is a planet outside our solar system
- The 'habitable zone' means the area where life could potentially exist
- This is telling us about the FIRST such planet discovered
- 'was conclusively identified'
- Scientists definitively found and confirmed this planet
Now here's where we have the blank - the sentence continues with 'by(?)':
- We need to see what comes next to understand what works here
Let's look at our choices:
- The options are about what punctuation (if any) should come after "by"
- by (no punctuation)
- by, (with a comma)
- by: (with a colon)
- by; (with a semicolon)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying:
- 'by astronomers at the European Southern Observatory'
- This tells us WHO made this identification
- The astronomers work at a specific place - the European Southern Observatory
- 'opening new possibilities for discovering extraterrestrial life'
- This discovery created new opportunities to find alien life
What do we notice about the structure here?
- The phrase "by astronomers at the European Southern Observatory" is one continuous unit
- "By" is connecting us to WHO did the identifying
- "Astronomers at the European Southern Observatory" tells us the specific people
- These parts need to flow together smoothly
- "By" + "astronomers" work as a pair - they're describing the doer of the action
- Just like you'd say "identified by scientists" or "written by the author"
- There's no natural pause or break between "by" and "astronomers"
So we need no punctuation after "by" - it should flow directly into "astronomers."
The correct answer is A (by).
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Keeping Prepositions Connected to Their Objects
When you use a preposition (words like "by," "in," "on," "with," "from," etc.) to show a relationship, the preposition needs to connect directly to its object (the noun or noun phrase that follows) without any punctuation separating them:
Pattern:
- Preposition + Object (+ any descriptors of that object) = one continuous unit
- No punctuation should interrupt this flow
Examples:
- "The book was written by the famous author from Ireland"
- by = preposition
- the famous author = object
- from Ireland = descriptor
- All flow together without punctuation
- "The discovery was made in the laboratory at Stanford University"
- in = preposition
- the laboratory = object
- at Stanford University = descriptor
- No punctuation breaks up this phrase
In this question:
- "identified by astronomers at the European Southern Observatory"
- by = preposition
- astronomers = object
- at the European Southern Observatory = descriptor
- These must stay connected: "by astronomers" (no punctuation between them)
This is called a prepositional phrase in grammar terms, and it functions as one cohesive unit in a sentence - so don't break it apart with punctuation!
by
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
by,
✗ Incorrect
- A comma after "by" would incorrectly separate two parts that belong together
- "By" is telling us who did the action, and it needs to connect directly to "astronomers"
- You wouldn't write "identified by, astronomers" any more than you'd write "written by, the author" or "discovered by, scientists"
- The comma creates an unnatural and grammatically incorrect break
by:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce something that follows - like a list, explanation, or example
- That's not what's happening here - we're simply stating who did the identifying as part of the main sentence flow
- A colon would also incorrectly separate "by" from "astronomers," breaking up a phrase that should work as one unit
by;
✗ Incorrect
- A semicolon separates two complete thoughts that could stand alone as full sentences
- "By" alone isn't a complete thought - it's just the beginning of a phrase telling us who did the identifying
- This creates a nonsensical break in the sentence structure