The forty-seven geothermal springs of Arkansas' Hot Springs National Park are sourced via a process known as natural groundwater recharge,...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The forty-seven geothermal springs of Arkansas' Hot Springs National Park are sourced via a process known as natural groundwater recharge, in which rainwater percolates downward through the earth—in this case, the porous rocks of the hills around Hot ______ collect in a subterranean basin.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
Springs to
Springs: to
Springs-to
Springs, to
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The forty-seven geothermal springs of Arkansas' Hot Springs National Park
- are sourced via a process known as natural groundwater recharge,
- in which rainwater percolates downward through the earth—
- in this case, the porous rocks of the hills around Hot Springs (?) to
- in which rainwater percolates downward through the earth—
- collect in a subterranean basin.
- are sourced via a process known as natural groundwater recharge,
Where (?) = nothing, colon, dash, or comma
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
The sentence tells us that:
- The forty-seven geothermal springs of Arkansas' Hot Springs National Park
- are sourced via a process known as natural groundwater recharge
So we're learning about how these springs get their water—through a process called "natural groundwater recharge."
The sentence then explains what this process involves:
- "in which rainwater percolates downward through the earth"
- So rainwater seeps down through the earth
Then we see a dash: "—in this case, the porous rocks of the hills around Hot Springs"
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- They differ in what punctuation comes after "Hot Springs"
- The choices are: nothing, a colon, a dash, or a comma
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The sentence continues: "to collect in a subterranean basin"
- So after the rainwater percolates down, it collects in an underground basin
Now let's understand what the structure is telling us:
- The main flow describes what happens:
- "rainwater percolates downward through the earth...to collect in a subterranean basin"
- But there's extra information inserted in the middle:
- "in this case, the porous rocks of the hills around Hot Springs"
- This clarifies what "the earth" specifically means in this situation
- Notice that this extra information was introduced with a dash after "earth"
What do we notice about the structure here?
- We have an interruption in the middle of the sentence
- It started with a dash after "earth"
- It provides clarifying information
- Then the sentence needs to return to its main flow
- When you interrupt a sentence with a dash, you need another dash to close that interruption
- Think of it like parentheses—you need both an opening and a closing mark
- The structure should be: [main sentence]—[interruption]—[continuation]
So we need a dash after "Hot Springs" to close the interruption and signal the return to the main sentence flow.
The correct answer is C: "Hot Springs—to"
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Using Paired Dashes for Interruptions
When you want to insert extra information in the middle of a sentence, you can use paired dashes (called parenthetical dashes in grammar terms) to mark where the interruption begins and ends. The key rule: if you open with a dash, you must close with a dash.
The pattern looks like this:
Example 1:
- Without interruption: The committee reviewed the proposal and approved it.
- With interruption: The committee—all five members were present—reviewed the proposal and approved it.
- Main sentence: "The committee reviewed the proposal and approved it"
- Interruption: "all five members were present"
- Dashes mark both the beginning and end
Example 2:
- Without interruption: The study examined students from diverse backgrounds to understand learning patterns.
- With interruption: The study examined students from diverse backgrounds—including urban, suburban, and rural schools—to understand learning patterns.
- Main sentence: "The study examined students from diverse backgrounds to understand learning patterns"
- Interruption: "including urban, suburban, and rural schools"
- Dashes create symmetrical boundaries
In this question:
- Main sentence flow: "rainwater percolates downward through the earth...to collect in a subterranean basin"
- Interruption: "in this case, the porous rocks of the hills around Hot Springs"
- First dash after "earth" opens the interruption
- Second dash after "Hot Springs" closes it and returns to the main flow
The symmetry is essential—both marks must match!
Springs to
✗ Incorrect
- Fails to close the interruption that was opened with the first dash
- Leaves the sentence structure broken—readers can't tell where the interruption ends
- "Hot Springs to collect" runs together incorrectly without proper punctuation
Springs: to
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce something new (like a list or explanation)
- Here we're not introducing new information; we're closing an interruption and returning to the original sentence flow
- The colon serves the wrong grammatical function for this structure
Springs-to
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
Springs, to
✗ Incorrect
- Creates asymmetrical punctuation: dash...comma
- When you open an interruption with a dash, you must close it with a dash
- Mixing punctuation marks violates the pairing rule—they must match