prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

The kelp forests along California's coastline create diverse underwater habitats, supporting sea otters, rockfish, and hundreds of invertebrate specie...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Boundaries
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

The kelp forests along California's coastline create diverse underwater habitats, supporting sea otters, rockfish, and hundreds of invertebrate species. These complex ecosystems have become a central research area for _____ at the Marine Science Institute.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

marine biologist: Elena Torres

B

marine biologist Elena Torres

C

marine biologist, Elena Torres,

D

marine biologist, Elena Torres

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • The kelp forests along California's coastline
    • create diverse underwater habitats,
      • supporting sea otters, rockfish, and hundreds of invertebrate species.
  • These complex ecosystems
    • have become a central research area
      • for marine biologist (?) Elena Torres
        • at the Marine Science Institute.

Understanding the Meaning

Let's start from the beginning:

The first sentence tells us:

  • 'The kelp forests along California's coastline create diverse underwater habitats'
    • These underwater forests are home to many different species
  • 'supporting sea otters, rockfish, and hundreds of invertebrate species'
    • This gives us examples of who lives in these kelp forest habitats

Now the second sentence:

  • 'These complex ecosystems have become a central research area for...'
    • The kelp forests are being studied

This is where we have the blank: 'for _____ at the Marine Science Institute.'

Let's look at our choices:

  • A uses a colon between "marine biologist" and "Elena Torres"
  • B has no punctuation between them
  • C has commas before and after "Elena Torres"
  • D has a comma only before "Elena Torres"

To see what works here, let's understand what these two pieces of information are doing together!

We have:

  • 'marine biologist' – a general job title
  • 'Elena Torres' – a specific person's name

What do we notice about the structure here?

The name is directly identifying which marine biologist we're talking about:

  • The two pieces work together as a single unit
    • Like saying "Professor Smith" or "Doctor Martinez"
    • The name tells us which marine biologist, not extra information about one we already know
  • This is essential information:
    • Without the name, we wouldn't know which marine biologist
    • The name isn't a side note – it's the identification itself

When a name directly follows a title like this to specify who we're talking about, we don't use any punctuation between them.

So we need: marine biologist Elena Torres (no punctuation).

The answer is Choice B.


Grammar Concept Applied

Essential Identification: Title + Name Without Punctuation

When a specific name directly follows a general title and identifies which person you're talking about, no punctuation is used between them. The title and name work together as a single identifying unit.

Pattern:

  • Title + Name (essential identification): marine biologist Elena Torres
    • The name is essential - it tells us which marine biologist
    • No punctuation between title and name
    • Like: Professor Martinez, Captain Reynolds, Senator Harris

This is different from adding a name as extra information:

  • The [title], [Name], (nonessential information): The marine biologist, Elena Torres, has published extensively...
    • Here "the marine biologist" already identifies the person
    • The name is extra information (called an appositive in grammar terms)
    • Requires commas on both sides

In our question:

  • "for marine biologist Elena Torres" - the name identifies which marine biologist
  • Essential information → no punctuation
  • They form one identification unit
Answer Choices Explained
A

marine biologist: Elena Torres

✗ Incorrect

  • A colon is used to introduce a list, explanation, or elaboration that follows
  • Here, "Elena Torres" isn't explaining what a marine biologist is – it's simply telling us which specific person we're talking about
  • This creates an incorrect use of the colon
B

marine biologist Elena Torres

✓ Correct

Correct as explained in the solution above.

C

marine biologist, Elena Torres,

✗ Incorrect

  • The commas on both sides would treat "Elena Torres" as nonessential, extra information
  • But the name IS essential – without it, we don't know which marine biologist the sentence is referring to
  • This punctuation pattern would only work if we said "the marine biologist, Elena Torres," where we're adding a name to someone already identified
  • Creates unnecessary and incorrect punctuation
D

marine biologist, Elena Torres

✗ Incorrect

  • The single comma creates an awkward, incorrect break between the title and name
  • If the name were meant to be set off as extra information, it would need commas on both sides
  • This disrupts the natural flow of the title-name unit
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.