prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

The marine biologist's fieldwork in the Galápagos Islands yielded unprecedented insights into evolutionary adaptation. Her detailed _____ the identifi...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Prism
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
HARD
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

The marine biologist's fieldwork in the Galápagos Islands yielded unprecedented insights into evolutionary adaptation. Her detailed _____ the identification of three new finch subspecies, the documentation of behavioral variations across islands, and the collection of thousands of genetic samples, established a foundation for decades of subsequent research.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

observations included

B

observations would include

C

observations, including

D

observations, include

Solution

Sentence Structure

  • The marine biologist's fieldwork in the Galápagos Islands
    • yielded unprecedented insights into evolutionary adaptation.
  • Her detailed observations [?]
    • the identification of three new finch subspecies,
    • the documentation of behavioral variations across islands,
    • and the collection of thousands of genetic samples,
    • established a foundation for decades of subsequent research.

Understanding the Meaning

The first sentence gives us context:

  • 'The marine biologist's fieldwork in the Galápagos Islands yielded unprecedented insights into evolutionary adaptation.'
    • So we have a marine biologist whose work led to new understanding about how species adapt and evolve.

Now the second sentence begins:

  • 'Her detailed observations...'
    • This tells us the sentence is about the biologist's observations.

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:

  • A and B use verb forms: "included" and "would include"
  • C uses a comma and "including"
  • D uses a comma and "include"

To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!

After the blank comes a list of three things:

  • 'the identification of three new finch subspecies'
  • 'the documentation of behavioral variations across islands'
  • 'and the collection of thousands of genetic samples'
    • These are all things that describe what the observations contained or involved.

Then after another comma:

  • 'established a foundation for decades of subsequent research'
    • This tells us what the observations DID - they created a basis for future research.

Now let's understand what role each part plays:

  • The core sentence is:
    • Subject: "Her detailed observations"
    • Main verb: "established"
    • Object: "a foundation for decades of subsequent research"
  • The list in the middle (the three items about finch subspecies, behavioral variations, and genetic samples):
    • provides extra descriptive information about what those observations included
    • is NOT the main action of the sentence
    • the main action is "established"

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • We need something that introduces the list as descriptive information
    • not as the main verb of the sentence
  • The list should be clearly separated from the main sentence structure
    • it's additional detail, set apart by commas
  • "including" introduces examples or details
    • it signals "here are some specific things these observations contained"
    • it keeps the list as a modifying phrase, not as the main action

So we need: observations, including

This creates a phrase "including the identification... genetic samples" that describes the observations, while "established" remains the clear main verb telling us what those observations accomplished.


GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Using Comma + Participle to Add Descriptive Details

When you want to add extra descriptive information or examples about something you just mentioned, you can use a comma followed by a present participle (like "including," "containing," "featuring") to introduce that information. This creates a modifying phrase (called a participial phrase in grammar terms) that's clearly separate from the main action of the sentence:

Pattern:

  • Main subject + main verb → The company's new policy established clear guidelines
  • Subject + , participle + details + , main verb → The company's new policy, including provisions for remote work and flexible hours, established clear guidelines
    • "The company's new policy" = subject
    • ", including provisions for remote work and flexible hours," = modifying phrase with examples
    • "established" = main verb (the primary action)

In our question:

  • Subject: "Her detailed observations"
  • Modifying phrase: ", including the identification of three new finch subspecies, the documentation of behavioral variations across islands, and the collection of thousands of genetic samples,"
  • Main verb: "established"
  • Object: "a foundation for decades of subsequent research"

The comma before "including" signals that we're adding descriptive details, and the comma after "genetic samples" closes off that descriptive phrase and brings us back to the main action: "established."

Answer Choices Explained
A

observations included

✗ Incorrect

  • This makes "included" into a main verb of the sentence
  • But then we have "established" appearing later as another main verb
  • The sentence would have two competing main verbs, creating structural confusion and making it unclear what the sentence is actually saying
B

observations would include

✗ Incorrect

  • Same problem as Choice A - "would include" becomes a main verb
  • This creates competition with "established" and makes the sentence structure unclear
  • The sentence can't effectively communicate its meaning with two main verb phrases
C

observations, including

✓ Correct

  • Correct as explained in the solution above.
D

observations, include

✗ Incorrect

  • A comma followed directly by the bare verb "include" doesn't create a proper grammatical connection
  • This creates a comma splice (incorrectly joining parts with just a comma)
  • The structure simply doesn't work in Standard English
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.