The museum unveiled its new exhibition in March, the carefully curated collection _____ artifacts from five different continents and spanning...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The museum unveiled its new exhibition in March, the carefully curated collection _____ artifacts from five different continents and spanning three centuries.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
would feature
had featured
to feature
featuring
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The museum unveiled its new exhibition in March,
- the carefully curated collection [?] artifacts from five different continents
- and spanning three centuries.
- the carefully curated collection [?] artifacts from five different continents
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
'The museum unveiled its new exhibition in March,'
This tells us:
- A museum revealed or opened a new exhibition
- This happened in March
That's a complete thought. Now the sentence continues after the comma:
'the carefully curated collection _____ artifacts from five different continents and spanning three centuries.'
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- would feature (a conditional verb)
- had featured (a past perfect verb)
- to feature (an infinitive)
- featuring (a participle)
To see what works here, let's read the rest and understand what this part is telling us!
The phrase describes:
- 'the carefully curated collection' - this is referring back to the exhibition
- It does something with 'artifacts from five different continents'
- 'and spanning three centuries'
Now, what do we notice about the structure here?
Notice that 'spanning' at the end:
- It's a present participle (an -ing form)
- It's connected with 'and' to whatever fills the blank
The phrase after the comma is giving us extra descriptive information about the exhibition - it's not starting a whole new independent sentence. It's describing what makes this collection special.
Also notice the parallel structure:
- We need something that works with 'and spanning'
- Since 'spanning' is a participle, we need another participle to match it
- This creates: '[participle] artifacts... and spanning three centuries'
So we need: featuring
This gives us two parallel participles (featuring... and spanning...) that together describe the carefully curated collection. The whole phrase after the comma provides additional details about the exhibition without creating a separate sentence.
Grammar Concept Applied
Using Participles to Create Descriptive Phrases
When you want to add descriptive information after a comma without creating a second independent clause, you can use a participle (called a participial phrase in grammar terms). This keeps everything as one grammatical unit:
Pattern:
- Main clause (complete thought): The museum unveiled its new exhibition in March
- Comma + Descriptive phrase using participle: the carefully curated collection featuring artifacts from five continents and spanning three centuries
- "featuring" and "spanning" = present participles
- They work together to describe "the collection"
- This is NOT a second independent clause
Why participles work here:
- They create modifying phrases, not separate clauses
- They can work in parallel (featuring... and spanning...)
- They avoid comma splices
What would be wrong:
- Using finite verbs like "would feature" or "had featured" would create two independent clauses
- Two independent clauses joined by only a comma = comma splice (grammatical error)
- You'd need a semicolon, period, or conjunction to join them properly
In our question:
- "featuring" creates a descriptive phrase that adds information about the collection
- It parallels "spanning" to create a smooth, unified description
- The entire phrase after the comma remains a modifier, not a new sentence
would feature
✗ Incorrect
- This is a finite verb that would create a second independent clause
- You can't join two complete independent clauses with just a comma - that's called a comma splice
- It also breaks the parallel structure with "spanning"
had featured
✗ Incorrect
- This is also a finite verb that creates a comma splice problem
- Additionally, the past perfect tense doesn't make logical sense here - we're describing what the collection does as part of this exhibition, not something that happened even earlier in the past
to feature
✗ Incorrect
- This infinitive form doesn't create coherent meaning in this context
- It breaks the parallel structure with "spanning"
- The phrase would be incomplete and grammatically awkward
featuring
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.