The pedagogy of the Suzuki method is rooted in several central ________ by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki, who sought to...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
The pedagogy of the Suzuki method is rooted in several central ________ by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki, who sought to parallel the linguistic learning environment, the method emphasizes playing instruments from a very young age and teaches students as young as three to play simple classical pieces such as 'March in G.'
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
tenets. Developed
tenets developed
tenets that, developed
tenets, developed
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- The pedagogy of the Suzuki method
- is rooted in several central tenets [?] by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki,
- who sought to parallel the linguistic
- learning environment,
- is rooted in several central tenets [?] by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki,
- the method emphasizes playing instruments from a very young age
- and teaches students as young as three
- to play simple classical pieces such as 'March in G.'
- and teaches students as young as three
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
The pedagogy of the Suzuki method
is rooted in several central tenets...
So we're learning about the Suzuki method - specifically, that its teaching approach is based on some central principles or core beliefs (tenets).
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- A. tenets. Developed (period, then capital D - two sentences)
- B. tenets developed (no punctuation - continuous)
- C. tenets that, developed (adds "that" and comma)
- D. tenets, developed (comma only)
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
The text continues:
"...by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki, who sought to parallel the linguistic learning environment, the method emphasizes playing instruments from a very young age and teaches students as young as three to play simple classical pieces such as 'March in G.'"
Now let's break down what this is telling us:
- 'by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki'
- tells us who created this method
- 'who sought to parallel the linguistic learning environment'
- explains Suzuki's goal - he wanted to make learning music similar to how children naturally learn language
- 'the method emphasizes playing instruments from a very young age and teaches students as young as three to play simple classical pieces such as March in G'
- Now we get concrete details about what the method actually does:
- it focuses on starting very young
- it teaches even three-year-olds to play real classical pieces
- Now we get concrete details about what the method actually does:
What do we notice about the structure here?
Look at this part: "the method emphasizes... and teaches..."
- This has its own subject ("the method") and its own verbs ("emphasizes" and "teaches")
- This is a complete thought that could stand alone as a sentence
And before it, we have: "The pedagogy of the Suzuki method is rooted in several central tenets"
- This ALSO has its own subject ("The pedagogy") and verb ("is rooted")
- This is ALSO a complete thought that could stand alone
So we have two complete independent thoughts here. When we have two complete thoughts, we need to separate them properly. We can't just connect them with a comma (that's called a comma splice) or with no punctuation (that's a run-on).
Where should we separate them?
Looking at "Developed by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki, who sought to parallel the linguistic learning environment" - this descriptive phrase about who developed the method makes more sense as the beginning of the second sentence, introducing and describing "the method" that follows.
So we need: A period after "tenets" to create two proper sentences.
The correct answer is Choice A (tenets. Developed).
This creates:
- Sentence 1: States what the pedagogy is based on
- Sentence 2: Tells us who developed it and what it emphasizes, with "Developed by..." serving as an introductory phrase that describes "the method"
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Separating Two Complete Thoughts (Independent Clauses)
When you have two complete thoughts that could each stand alone as sentences (called independent clauses in grammar terms), you must separate them properly. You have three options:
- Use a period (making two sentences)
- First complete thought: "The pedagogy of the Suzuki method is rooted in several central tenets."
- Second complete thought: "Developed by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki, the method emphasizes playing instruments from a very young age."
- Use a semicolon
- "The pedagogy is rooted in central tenets; the method emphasizes early learning."
- Use a comma + coordinating conjunction (and, but, or, nor, for, so, yet)
- "The pedagogy is rooted in central tenets, and the method emphasizes early learning."
What you CANNOT do:
- Use only a comma (creates a comma splice error)
- Use no punctuation (creates a run-on sentence)
In this question:
The passage contains two independent clauses that need separation. A period is the most natural choice because the second sentence begins with a descriptive phrase ("Developed by Japanese violinist Shinichi Suzuki...") that introduces and modifies its subject ("the method"). This makes the two-sentence structure clear and easy to read.
tenets. Developed
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
tenets developed
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a run-on sentence
- If "developed" modifies "tenets," then when we reach "the method emphasizes," we have a completely new independent clause starting without any punctuation
- You can't have two independent clauses joined with no punctuation between them
tenets that, developed
✗ Incorrect
- Grammatically incorrect structure
- You cannot place a comma immediately after "that" in a relative clause like this
- Even if the structure were fixed, this would still create the same run-on problem when "the method emphasizes" begins a new independent clause
tenets, developed
✗ Incorrect
- Creates a comma splice
- When we eventually get to "the method emphasizes," we have a new independent clause
- Two independent clauses cannot be joined with just a comma - this is one of the most common sentence structure errors