Tides can deposit large quantities of dead vegetation within a salt marsh, smothering healthy plants and leaving a salt panne—a...
GMAT Information and Ideas : (Ideas) Questions
Tides can deposit large quantities of dead vegetation within a salt marsh, smothering healthy plants and leaving a salt panne—a depression devoid of plants that tends to trap standing water—in the marsh's interior. Ecologist Kathryn Beheshti and colleagues found that burrowing crabs living within these pannes improve drainage by loosening the soil, leading the pannes to shrink as marsh plants move back in. At salt marsh edges, however, crab-induced soil loosening can promote marsh loss by accelerating erosion, suggesting that the burrowing action of crabs ______
Which choice most logically completes the text?
can be beneficial to marshes with small pannes but can be harmful to marshes with large pannes.
may promote increases in marsh plants or decreases in marsh plants, depending on the crabs' location.
tends to be more heavily concentrated in areas of marsh interiors with standing water than at marsh edges.
varies in intensity depending on the size of the panne relative to the size of the surrounding marsh.
Step 1: Decode and Map the Passage
Part A: Passage Analysis Table
| Text from Passage | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Tides can deposit large quantities of dead vegetation within a salt marsh, smothering healthy plants |
|
| and leaving a salt panne—a depression devoid of plants that tends to trap standing water—in the marsh's interior. |
|
| Ecologist Kathryn Beheshti and colleagues found that burrowing crabs living within these pannes improve drainage by loosening the soil, |
|
| leading the pannes to shrink as marsh plants move back in. |
|
| At salt marsh edges, however, crab-induced soil loosening can promote marsh loss by accelerating erosion, |
|
| suggesting that the burrowing action of crabs ______ |
|
Part B: Passage Architecture & Core Elements
Main Point: Crab burrowing has opposite effects depending on where it occurs—beneficial in marsh interiors but harmful at marsh edges.
Argument Flow: The passage starts with a salt marsh problem (dead vegetation creating pannes), then presents research showing crabs can help solve this problem by improving drainage in pannes. However, it contrasts this with the finding that the same crab activity causes harm at marsh edges through increased erosion, leading to a conclusion about the location-dependent nature of crab effects.
Step 2: Interpret the Question Precisely
This is a fill-in-the-blank question asking us to choose the best logical connector. The answer must create the right relationship between what comes before and after the blank.
Step 3: Prethink the Answer
- The research shows crab burrowing has two completely different outcomes:
- In salt pannes (marsh interior): positive effect (helps plants return)
- At marsh edges: negative effect (increases erosion and marsh loss)
- The key insight is that the SAME activity (crab burrowing) produces opposite results depending on WHERE it happens
- The right answer should capture this location-dependent nature of the effects—that crab burrowing can be either beneficial or harmful depending on where the crabs are located within the marsh system
can be beneficial to marshes with small pannes but can be harmful to marshes with large pannes.
✗ Incorrect
- Focuses on panne size (small vs. large pannes)
- The passage doesn't discuss panne size as a factor
- Misses the key point about location (interior vs. edges)
may promote increases in marsh plants or decreases in marsh plants, depending on the crabs' location.
✓ Correct
- Directly captures the location-dependent effects: depending on the crabs' location
- Accurately reflects both outcomes: increases in marsh plants (interior) and decreases in marsh plants (edges)
- Matches our prethinking about the same activity having opposite effects based on where it occurs
tends to be more heavily concentrated in areas of marsh interiors with standing water than at marsh edges.
✗ Incorrect
- Focuses on concentration/intensity of burrowing activity
- The passage doesn't compare how heavily concentrated crab burrowing is in different areas
- This trap choice might seem appealing because the passage mentions both interior and edge locations, but it's discussing distribution rather than effects
varies in intensity depending on the size of the panne relative to the size of the surrounding marsh.
✗ Incorrect
- Discusses intensity varying by size ratios
- The passage doesn't mention anything about panne size relative to marsh size
- Completely misses the location-based effects that drive the passage's logic