Toni Morrison, a novelist and essayist, _____ the first African American woman to win the Nobel Prize in Literature when...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Toni Morrison, a novelist and essayist, _____ the first African American woman to win the Nobel Prize in Literature when she received the honor in 1993.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
were
have been
was
are
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Toni Morrison,
- a novelist and essayist,
- [?] the first African American woman to win the Nobel Prize in Literature
- when she received the honor in 1993.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading from the beginning:
"Toni Morrison" - this is who the sentence is about.
"a novelist and essayist" - this is a quick descriptive note about Toni Morrison, set off by commas.
Now here's where we need to fill in the blank:
"Toni Morrison... [blank] the first African American woman to win the Nobel Prize in Literature when she received the honor in 1993."
Let's look at our choices - they're all different forms of the verb "to be":
- were (plural, past)
- have been (plural, present perfect)
- was (singular, past)
- are (plural, present)
Now, what do we need here?
First, let's think about the subject:
- "Toni Morrison" is one person - singular
- So we need a singular verb form
Second, let's think about the time:
- "in 1993" tells us this happened in the past
- "when she received the honor" also confirms past tense
- So we need past tense
What do we notice? We need a verb that is both:
- Singular (to match "Toni Morrison")
- Past tense (to match "in 1993")
The correct answer is was - it's the only choice that is both singular and past tense.
The complete sentence tells us: Toni Morrison became the first African American woman to win the Nobel Prize in Literature back in 1993.
Grammar Concept Applied
Subject-Verb Agreement with Interrupting Modifiers
The verb in a sentence must match its subject in number (singular or plural), even when descriptive phrases separate them. Also, the verb tense must match the time frame indicated in the sentence.
The Pattern:
Step 1: Identify the true subject
- Subject: Toni Morrison (singular)
- Interrupting phrase: "a novelist and essayist" (set off by commas - ignore when determining agreement)
Step 2: Determine number
- One person = singular subject
- Needs singular verb
Step 3: Determine tense
- Time indicator: "in 1993"
- Context: "when she received" (past)
- Needs past tense verb
Step 4: Choose the verb that matches
- Singular + Past = was
How this applies to our question:
Even though "a novelist and essayist" comes between the subject "Toni Morrison" and the verb, this interrupting phrase doesn't change the fact that "Toni Morrison" is singular. We look past the commas to connect the subject with its verb: "Toni Morrison... was the first African American woman..." The time frame "in 1993" confirms we need past tense, making "was" (singular, past) the only correct choice.
were
✗ Incorrect
- "Were" is the plural form of the past tense
- But our subject "Toni Morrison" is singular (one person)
- This creates a subject-verb agreement error
- We'd say "they were" or "the writers were," but not "Toni Morrison were"
have been
✗ Incorrect
- "Have been" is present perfect tense and plural
- This has two problems: wrong number (plural) and wrong tense
- The sentence describes something that happened at a specific time in 1993, so we need simple past tense
- Plus, it doesn't agree with the singular subject "Toni Morrison"
was
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.
are
✗ Incorrect
- "Are" is present tense and plural
- Wrong on both counts: it's plural (doesn't match singular "Toni Morrison") and present tense (doesn't match the 1993 time frame)
- The event happened in the past, so present tense doesn't fit