Trained in classical French culinary techniques and mentored by three Michelin-starred chefs throughout her decade-long apprenticeship, _____ now oper...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Trained in classical French culinary techniques and mentored by three Michelin-starred chefs throughout her decade-long apprenticeship, _____ now operates the most acclaimed farm-to-table restaurant in the Pacific Northwest.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
the farm-to-table restaurant that chef Maria Gonzalez operates
chef Maria Gonzalez's innovative restaurant in the Pacific Northwest
chef Maria Gonzalez
when chef Maria Gonzalez opened her restaurant, it
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- Trained in classical French culinary techniques and mentored by three Michelin-starred chefs throughout her decade-long apprenticeship,
- (?) now operates the most acclaimed farm-to-table restaurant in the Pacific Northwest.
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start reading and understanding from the beginning:
- "Trained in classical French culinary techniques and mentored by three Michelin-starred chefs throughout her decade-long apprenticeship"
This opening phrase is describing someone's impressive background:
- This person was trained in French culinary techniques
- This person was mentored by three Michelin-starred chefs
- This mentoring happened throughout a decade-long apprenticeship
- The word "her" tells us this is about a woman
Now here's where we need to fill in the blank.
Let's look at our choices:
- Choice A gives us "the farm-to-table restaurant that chef Maria Gonzalez operates"
- Choice B gives us "chef Maria Gonzalez's innovative restaurant"
- Choice C gives us "chef Maria Gonzalez"
- Choice D gives us "when chef Maria Gonzalez opened her restaurant, it"
So we're deciding between starting with a person or starting with a restaurant.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- The opening phrase describes a PERSON who was trained and mentored
- When you start a sentence with a descriptive phrase like this,
- whatever comes right after the comma must be the person or thing being described.
- Since the opening describes a PERSON (someone who was trained and mentored in cooking),
- the subject right after the comma must be that person.
So we need Choice C: chef Maria Gonzalez
Now let's read the rest to see the complete picture:
- "now operates the most acclaimed farm-to-table restaurant in the Pacific Northwest"
The complete sentence tells us:
- Chef Maria Gonzalez had this extensive training and mentoring,
- and now she operates this highly acclaimed restaurant.
- Her impressive background led to her current success.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Descriptive Phrases Must Modify the Right Noun
When a sentence begins with a descriptive phrase (called a participial phrase in grammar terms) set off by a comma, the noun that immediately follows that comma must be the person or thing being described.
The Pattern:
- [Description of X], X does something
- Correct: "Exhausted from the long journey, the hikers collapsed in their tent."
- "Exhausted from the long journey" describes → the hikers ✓
- [Description of X], Y does something
- Incorrect: "Exhausted from the long journey, the tent provided shelter."
- "Exhausted from the long journey" describes → the tent? ✗
- The tent wasn't exhausted; the hikers were
In our question:
- Opening phrase: "Trained in classical French culinary techniques and mentored by three Michelin-starred chefs throughout her decade-long apprenticeship"
- This describes → a person (specifically the chef)
- What must follow: chef Maria Gonzalez
- The person who was trained and mentored ✓
- What can't follow: the restaurant, chef Maria Gonzalez's restaurant, or "when...it"
- These would illogically suggest the restaurant was trained and mentored ✗
Key Principle: Whatever is doing the action in your opening descriptive phrase must be the subject that comes right after the comma. In this case, the person who was trained and mentored (chef Maria Gonzalez) must be the subject.
the farm-to-table restaurant that chef Maria Gonzalez operates
✗ Incorrect
- This makes "the restaurant" the subject of the sentence
- But the opening phrase describes someone who was "trained" and "mentored" - this must be a person, not a building
- A restaurant can't be trained in culinary techniques or have an apprenticeship
- This creates what's called a misplaced modifier - the description doesn't match what follows
chef Maria Gonzalez's innovative restaurant in the Pacific Northwest
✗ Incorrect
- This also makes "restaurant" the subject (even though it belongs to Maria Gonzalez)
- The opening phrase still describes a person who was trained and mentored, not a restaurant
- Again, we'd be illogically saying the restaurant was trained and mentored
- The possessive "chef Maria Gonzalez's" just shows ownership, but doesn't make Maria the subject
chef Maria Gonzalez
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
when chef Maria Gonzalez opened her restaurant, it
✗ Incorrect
- This creates multiple structural problems
- First, "it" (referring to the restaurant) becomes what was supposedly trained and mentored
- Second, "when...it now operates" creates an awkward, incomplete structure
- The word "when" sets up a time clause that doesn't properly connect to the rest of the sentence