While light is known as one of the fastest-moving substances, it slows down when passing through some types of matter....
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
While light is known as one of the fastest-moving substances, it slows down when passing through some types of matter. One such type of matter is a form of cooled, condensed gas called a Bose-Einstein condensate ______ Dutch physicist Lene Hau famously used a BEC to slow a beam of light to a complete halt.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
(BEC),
(BEC) and
(BEC);
(BEC)
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
- While light is known as one of the fastest-moving substances,
- it slows down
- when passing through some types of matter.
- it slows down
- One such type of matter is a form of cooled, condensed gas
- called a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC)[?]
- Dutch physicist Lene Hau famously used a BEC
- to slow a beam of light
- to a complete halt.
- to slow a beam of light
- Where [?] = comma / "and" / semicolon / nothing
Understanding the Meaning
Let's start from the beginning:
The first sentence gives us some background:
- "While light is known as one of the fastest-moving substances, it slows down when passing through some types of matter."
- So light is super fast, but certain materials can slow it down.
Now the passage gets more specific:
- "One such type of matter is a form of cooled, condensed gas called a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC)"
- This tells us about one specific type of matter that slows light
- It's a special kind of cooled gas
- It's called a Bose-Einstein condensate, or BEC for short
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at the choices:
- We need to decide whether to use a comma, "and", a semicolon, or nothing
To see what works here, let's read the rest and understand what it's saying!
The text continues:
- "Dutch physicist Lene Hau famously used a BEC to slow a beam of light to a complete halt."
- This gives us a real-world example
- A physicist named Lene Hau actually used one of these BECs
- She managed to completely stop light with it
Now, what do we notice about the structure here?
Let me look at what comes before and after the blank:
- Before the blank: "One such type of matter is a form of cooled, condensed gas called a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC)"
- This is a complete thought that could stand alone
- It has a subject ("One such type of matter") and a verb ("is")
- It tells us everything we need to know: what this type of matter is
- After the blank: "Dutch physicist Lene Hau famously used a BEC to slow a beam of light to a complete halt."
- This is also a complete thought that could stand alone
- It has a subject ("Dutch physicist Lene Hau") and a verb ("used")
- It gives us a complete example of how a BEC was used
So we have two complete sentences that are closely related in meaning—the second one provides a specific example to illustrate the first.
When you have two complete sentences that are closely related, you need strong enough punctuation to properly separate them. A semicolon does exactly this job.
The correct answer is C: (BEC);
The semicolon joins these two complete, closely related thoughts while maintaining the proper separation between them.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Joining Two Complete Sentences with a Semicolon
When you have two complete sentences (each with its own subject and verb, expressing a complete thought—called independent clauses in grammar terms) that are closely related in meaning, you have several options for punctuation:
Option 1: Separate with a period
- Sentence one. Sentence two.
- Most straightforward, but can feel choppy if overused
Option 2: Join with a semicolon
- Sentence one; sentence two.
- Use this when the two thoughts are closely connected
- The semicolon says: "These are separate complete thoughts, but they're closely related"
Option 3: Join with comma + coordinating conjunction
- Sentence one, and sentence two.
- Must have BOTH the comma AND the conjunction (and, but, or, for, nor, yet, so)
In this question:
- First complete sentence: "One such type of matter is a form of cooled, condensed gas called a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC)"
- Subject: "One such type of matter"
- Verb: "is"
- Complete thought: tells us what this type of matter is
- Second complete sentence: "Dutch physicist Lene Hau famously used a BEC to slow a beam of light to a complete halt"
- Subject: "Dutch physicist Lene Hau"
- Verb: "used"
- Complete thought: tells us who used a BEC and what they accomplished
- These sentences are closely related (the second provides a specific example of the first)
- A semicolon perfectly joins them while maintaining proper separation
(BEC),
✗ Incorrect
(BEC),
- This creates what's called a comma splice
- Two complete sentences cannot be joined with just a comma
- You need stronger punctuation (like a semicolon) or you need to add a conjunction with the comma
- The comma alone is too weak to properly separate two independent thoughts
(BEC) and
✗ Incorrect
(BEC) and
- While "and" can connect two sentences, it needs a comma before it to be grammatically correct (comma + "and")
- Additionally, "and" suggests simply adding two equal ideas together
- But here, the second sentence specifically illustrates the first with a concrete example
- This makes "and" an awkward and imprecise connector for this relationship
(BEC);
✓ Correct
Correct as explained in the solution above.
(BEC)
✗ Incorrect
(BEC)
- This creates a run-on sentence
- Two complete sentences cannot be placed directly next to each other with no punctuation
- Without any separation, the reader can't tell where one complete thought ends and another begins
- This violates a fundamental rule of sentence structure