prismlearning.academy Logo
NEUR
N

Why are Rome's famous concrete structures, such as the Colosseum, still standing after 2,000-plus years, when modern concrete may not...

GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions

Source: Practice Test
Standard English Conventions
Form, Structure, and Sense
EASY
...
...
Notes
Post a Query

Why are Rome's famous concrete structures, such as the Colosseum, still standing after 2,000-plus years, when modern concrete may not even last for fifty? Scientists _______ that the secret to Roman concrete's durability was its unique blend of ingredients, which included volcanic ash and seawater.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A

explain

B

having explained

C

explaining

D

to explain

Solution

Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!

Sentence Structure

  • Why are Rome's famous concrete structures,
    • such as the Colosseum,
      • still standing after 2,000-plus years,
        • when modern concrete may not even last for fifty?
  • Scientists [?] that
    • the secret to Roman concrete's durability
      • was its unique blend of ingredients,
        • which included volcanic ash and seawater.

Understanding the Meaning

The first sentence sets up an interesting question:

  • Why do ancient Roman concrete structures like the Colosseum still stand after more than 2,000 years,
  • while modern concrete might only last fifty years?

Now the second sentence gives us the answer. It starts with:

  • 'Scientists ______ that the secret...'

This is where we have the blank. Let's look at our choices:

  • explain
  • having explained
  • explaining
  • to explain

Now here's what we need to understand. We have:

  • Subject: 'Scientists'
  • Then we need: a verb to tell us what scientists do
  • Then: 'that the secret...' - this tells us what the scientists say

What do we notice about the structure here?

  • 'Scientists' is the subject of this sentence
  • The sentence needs a complete verb - a main verb that makes the sentence work
  • Only 'explain' gives us that complete verb

The other forms - 'having explained,' 'explaining,' and 'to explain' - are all incomplete verb forms. They can't stand alone as the main verb of a sentence.

So we need: explain

Now let's read the complete sentence with this answer:

  • 'Scientists explain that the secret to Roman concrete's durability was its unique blend of ingredients, which included volcanic ash and seawater.'

This makes perfect sense - scientists explain (tell us) that the secret was the special mix of ingredients.

GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED

Main Verbs: What Makes a Sentence Complete

Every sentence needs a main verb - a complete verb form (called a finite verb in grammar terms) that can stand on its own. There are also incomplete verb forms (called non-finite verbs) like participles and infinitives that cannot serve as the main verb by themselves.

Complete verb forms (can be main verbs):

  • I explain the problem. ✓
  • Scientists discover new information. ✓
  • The team analyzed the data. ✓

Incomplete verb forms (cannot be main verbs alone):

  • Scientists explaining the problem. ✗ (fragment - needs helping verb: "are explaining")
  • The team to analyze the data. ✗ (incorrect structure)
  • Scientists having discovered the answer. ✗ (fragment - needs main verb)

In our question:

  • Subject: Scientists
  • Need: a main verb that completes the sentence
  • Choice: explain is the only complete verb form that can serve as the main verb
  • Result: "Scientists explain that..." = complete sentence ✓
Answer Choices Explained
A

explain

B

having explained

✗ Incorrect

  • This is a participle form that cannot serve as the main verb of a sentence
  • "Scientists having explained that..." would create an incomplete sentence - a fragment
  • This form would need to be part of a larger structure with a different main verb
C

explaining

✗ Incorrect

  • This is also a participle form that cannot stand alone as the main verb
  • "Scientists explaining that..." is incomplete - it's just a fragment
  • You would need a helping verb with this (like "are explaining") to make it work as a main verb
D

to explain

✗ Incorrect

  • This is an infinitive form that cannot function as the main verb
  • "Scientists to explain that..." is grammatically incorrect
  • Infinitives typically show purpose or act as objects, not as main verbs
Rate this Solution
Tell us what you think about this solution
...
...
Forum Discussions
Start a new discussion
Post
Load More
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Previous Attempts
Loading attempts...
Similar Questions
Finding similar questions...
Parallel Question Generator
Create AI-generated questions with similar patterns to master this question type.
Why are Rome's famous concrete structures, such as the Colosseum, still standing after 2,000-plus years, when modern concrete may not even last for fifty? Scientists _______ that the secret to Roman concrete's durability was its unique blend of ingredients, which included volcanic ash and seawater. : Standard English Conventions (Grammar)