Winding through the ice atop Norway's Jotunheim Mountains is the Lendbreen pass, an ancient route that was used by hunters,...
GMAT Standard English Conventions : (Grammar) Questions
Winding through the ice atop Norway's Jotunheim Mountains is the Lendbreen pass, an ancient route that was used by hunters, farmers, traders, and travelers in the Middle Ages before eventually falling into disuse. Recently, archeologists have ________ knives, horseshoes, wool tunics, and thousands of other artifacts from the icy pass.
Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?
unearthed:
unearthed,
unearthed—
unearthed
Let's begin by understanding the meaning of this sentence. We'll use our understanding of pause points and segment the sentence as shown - understanding and assimilating the meaning of each segment bit by bit!
Sentence Structure
Sentence 1:
- Winding through the ice atop Norway's Jotunheim Mountains
- is the Lendbreen pass,
- an ancient route
- that was used by hunters, farmers, traders, and travelers in the Middle Ages before eventually falling into disuse.
- an ancient route
Sentence 2:
- Recently,
- archeologists
- have unearthed[?] knives, horseshoes, wool tunics, and thousands of other artifacts from the icy pass.
Where [?] = : or , or — or nothing
Understanding the Meaning
The first sentence gives us context:
- It's describing the Lendbreen pass
- a route through the ice in Norway's mountains
- used by various people in the Middle Ages
- eventually stopped being used
Now the second sentence tells us about recent discoveries:
- "Recently, archeologists have unearthed..."
This is where we have the blank. Let's look at our choices:
- A adds a colon (:)
- B adds a comma (,)
- C adds a dash (—)
- D has no punctuation
To see what works here, let's read the rest of the sentence and understand what it's saying!
- "...knives, horseshoes, wool tunics, and thousands of other artifacts from the icy pass."
So the complete sentence tells us:
- Archeologists have recently dug up various historical items (knives, horseshoes, tunics, etc.) from this ancient pass.
What do we notice about the structure here?
- We have a basic sentence pattern:
- Subject: archeologists
- Verb: have unearthed
- Object: the things they dug up (knives, horseshoes, wool tunics, etc.)
- Where they found them: from the icy pass
- The list of items is the direct object of the verb "unearthed"
- It's answering the question "What did they unearth?"
- The verb flows directly into what was unearthed
- There's no grammatical reason to interrupt this connection
- A verb and its object work together as a unit
- You don't put punctuation between them
The correct answer is D (no punctuation). The verb "unearthed" flows directly into its object—the list of artifacts.
GRAMMAR CONCEPT APPLIED
Verbs and Their Objects: No Punctuation Between Them
When a verb takes a direct object (the thing receiving the action), the object follows immediately without any punctuation—even when the object is a list of multiple items:
Pattern: Subject + Verb + Direct Object (even if it's a list)
Example 1:
- ✓ "She bought apples, oranges, and bananas."
- ✗ "She bought: apples, oranges, and bananas."
- ✗ "She bought, apples, oranges, and bananas."
Example 2:
- ✓ "The museum displays paintings, sculptures, and photographs."
- ✗ "The museum displays: paintings, sculptures, and photographs."
In our question:
- Verb: "have unearthed"
- Direct object: "knives, horseshoes, wool tunics, and thousands of other artifacts"
- These connect directly with no punctuation
Note about colons and lists: You DO use a colon before a list when you have a complete independent clause that explicitly introduces the list (called an independent clause in grammar terms):
- ✓ "They found three categories of items: tools, clothing, and equipment."
But when the list is simply the verb's object—when it's answering "what" the verb acts upon—no punctuation is needed.
unearthed:
✗ Incorrect
- A colon is used to introduce a list after a complete, independent statement that sets up the list
- While you might use a colon in a sentence like "They found three types of items: knives, horseshoes, and tunics," here the list isn't being introduced after a complete setup
- The list is simply the direct object of the verb—it's what was unearthed
- Putting a colon here interrupts the natural verb-object relationship
unearthed,
✗ Incorrect
- A comma here would incorrectly separate the verb from its direct object
- This violates a fundamental rule: you never put a comma between a verb and what it acts upon
- "Have unearthed" needs to connect directly to "knives, horseshoes..." to show what was unearthed
unearthed—
✗ Incorrect
- A dash suggests that what follows is being set off as additional, parenthetical, or emphasized information
- But the list of artifacts isn't additional information—it's the essential object of the verb
- Without knowing what was unearthed, the sentence would be incomplete
- Dashes separate elements; they don't connect a verb to its necessary object
unearthed
✓ Correct
- Correct as explained in the solution above.